Anyone seen this? Experienced this? I havent tried yet.
http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=5462.0
Printable View
Anyone seen this? Experienced this? I havent tried yet.
http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=5462.0
Mine seems to do this. I don't know whether it's an issue though as I couldn't replicate it with a lens attached.
???? People are concerned about this and it doesn't happen with a lens attached? :confused::rolleyes:
I wouldn't worry about it. If you do some more research, older models did the same thing, and it hasn't affected anyone in real situations.
So I guess I'll need to make sure I attach a lens when trying to take pictures? Would be nice to have that much time on my hands.
Funny thing, my 5D3 exhibits this issue and the shots I have taken with it are pretty dead on. Now my 5D2 doesn't and my images were forever underexposed.
I definitely can't replicate the issue with a lens and no cap.
Yes it is true and it is a major flaw. It was a mistake to buy a 5D III.
All of your new 5D III’s are defective, sorry to everyone that bought one maybe I can help.
If you want I will give you $2,000 for your 5D III. Sorry I couldn’t give more, but after all your camera is defective. Please include your warranty card when you ship the camera.
I'll beat that offer. If you purchased a defective 5DIII, I'll trade you STRAIGHT-UP for my 60D. It'll save you the time it would take to purchase a new camera of your own. Plus, it's got a cropped sensor so your lenses will reach farther!
Aghh no, it's less awesome without a lens attached. It's nothing but a paper weight.
Imagine if the 1 Dx does it. Pros won't want it. It will be like Clark Kent standing outside a locked telephone box. All that latent awesomeness just bubbling under the surface, but not realised until a lens is put on, or in Clark's case stripping off and putting a cape on.
???