-
What's the best metering mode to use on an XTi??
-
Yup in terms of noise control 50D is hands down winner. Let's say outdoor shots where there is adequate lighting.. what do you think??
-
okay, Let's say there 2 persons with the same level of skill, but different equipment. one uses a relatively "old" Canon Xti with L lenses. the other a new Canon 50D with EF kit lens. Who among the two should get better images???
-
Hi keller, as previously mentioned in earlier posts there are a few things you can do to make your prints come out closer to what you see on your mac. Color profiles, monitor color calibrations thats all good. But do remember even with all this you are only half of the equation. The other would be your printer or the place where you get your prints
-
As we all know digital SLRs have a shutter life. When the camera reaches this the shutter has to be replaced[???] When replaced the camera can be used again for another number of shots. QUESTION: Will the replacement shutter affect image quality??? Affect it in such a way that it will decrease Image Quality??
-
here's another one at ISO 800 F2.8. By the way both of the pictures were done in manual mode. No post processing wAS applied to this second photo. Would you think it usable??
-
shot at ISO 800 F2.8. Did some post processing in DPP. Brightened the image by about .6 and applied NR. It was taken at dusk. what do you think??
-
Hi guys, thanks for all the input. lately i took some pictures at ISO 800. Some of them I was able to shoot with available light. Will post them. Do please tell me what you think of them. Hopefully I can get better pictures with all your help. Thanks!!
-
Hi Johnny, read your post. I am interested in that firmware hack you mentioned. just to clarify, won't it "mess" with my internal firmware?? What if I decide not to use it anymore, will my camera functions still be normal???
-
Hi john, I would suggest that you hav the camera body checked. My friend had the same problem with his 40D and it couldn't have come at a worse time. It was on a wedding photo coverage. If i remember correctly it had a something to do with the shutter or a chip in the camera body that controls the exposure. It was resolved at very minimal cost.