Originally Posted by bob williams
Thanks, Bob. My arms can also get tired. []
That background is the side of my house, which is at least 20 feet away. It's far enough away that at f/5.6, it's blurred completely.
Originally Posted by bob williams
Thanks, Bob. My arms can also get tired. []
That background is the side of my house, which is at least 20 feet away. It's far enough away that at f/5.6, it's blurred completely.
Finally got thru the first round (culling and PP a few) of my air show photos (really tired of looking at planes), so I went out this morning to shoot some HBs.
Boy, has the sun moved in just a week....fall is moving in quickly...to my benefit actually. I have much softer light on one of the feeders, but of course they didn't cooperate.
But I did catch my first juvie male RTHB of the season; 7D, 100-400 at 400mm, f6.3, ISO 400, 1/640
Just a thought for this thread; what would you think about IDing your HBs when you post them?
I know I have it pretty easy, living east of the Mississippi and having pretty much just the Ruby throated HB....thoughts?
Bob....headed your way next week and looking forward to some Calliopes and Anna's.
Great sites and links folks...thanks for sharing.
Bill
Bob, I think if the writting and story is enjoyable and well written I think people would enjoy it. I too use zenfolio, however, I have my own blog on my personal site. I'm wondering if I should start using their blog to give some of the photos a history. I'll have to look into it.
By the way your photos are great. Do you sit in a bird blind or have a large lens? I use the Canon 70-300 non L lens (I'd love to trade up to it though). I can't hotlink from ZF, but I'll post a link until I can get it uploaded elsewhere: http://www.jrogdenphotography.com/wi...other/ec6f0140 - the male wouldn't come out to play, only the female.
--
Thanks James------No, I usually don't sit in a blind unless I am shooting song birds and Yes, I do have a 500. But I have shot several of my H-Bird shots with a 100, so your 70-300 should work fine for hummers. Hummingbirds seem to be very tolerant of flashes and other close equipment so distance is normally not an issue. The problem with wider lenses is that you have more background to light which introduces more challenges depending on what your intent is.Do you sit in a bird blind or have a large lens?
Bob
Bob - I would be very interested in reading about how you get so many great shots of HB's. Your set up gives me something to strive for... although I do not think I can afford your set up (at least not right now with three kids in college). If you have some suggestions on how to get better shots with less flashes, and how to attract more HB's that would be great; but I think degrading your set up would only serve to diminish the great quality that you manage to get with your shots.
5DS R, 1D X, 7D, Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6, 24mm f/1.4L II, 16-35mm f/4L IS, 24-105mm f/4L, 50mm f/1.8, 100mm Macro f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L, 580EX-II
flickr
Thanks Conropl, but I will be the first to admit some of my favorite shots were taken with a $20 shoplight tiewrapped to a ladder and one canon flash.Your set up gives me something to strive for... although I do not think I can afford your set up
Conropl, I didn't understand this comment, could you explainbut I think degrading your set up would only serve to diminish the great quality that you manage to get with your shots.
Yes, I do have suggestions for both---time is short this morning, but I will try and offer some suggetstions this afternoon or this weekend when I start working on the blog.If you have some suggestions on how to get better shots with less flashes, and how to attract more HB's that would be great
Bob
What I meant was that the quality of your HB shots are awesome, and I am looking to get good results with a lesser set up. In the end, I realize that you cannot point me in a direction that would be a down grade of your set up and still get pictures of the quality you produce. However, I would be very happy to learn more so I can do better with what I have... with the realization that I am not going to reach your level of quality shots without putting more money into flashes and glass. Basically, you are out of my league, but I would like to get better.
5DS R, 1D X, 7D, Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6, 24mm f/1.4L II, 16-35mm f/4L IS, 24-105mm f/4L, 50mm f/1.8, 100mm Macro f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L, 580EX-II
flickr
one of my favorites from last season....the attachment came out darker than the original....resulting in loss of head details.
Bill
Conrople, don't let my set-up influence you, you can get great h-bird shots with far less equipment and a little garage engineering. Her are a couple of examples:What I meant was that the quality of your HB shots are awesome, and I am looking to get good results with a lesser set up. In the end, I realize that you cannot point me in a direction that would be a down grade of your set up and still get pictures of the quality you produce. However, I would be very happy to learn more so I can do better with what I have... with the realization that I am not going to reach your level of quality shots without putting more money into flashes and glass. Basically, you are out of my league, but I would like to get better.
This was shot with natural light only:
and this one was shot with one speedflash and a shoplight on the background:
Bob
I have one flash and a 100-400mm L. I am thinking about getting a "Better Beamer".
I still am interested in a blog or any tips to get better, although I think I still have 2-3 months before I am going to see any HB's.
Here is my best from last year using a flash. I have a ways to go , and need to work on the back ground and sharpness.
Hummingbird by westmichigan, on Flickr
And one w/o flash:
Hummingbird2 by westmichigan, on Flickr
5DS R, 1D X, 7D, Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6, 24mm f/1.4L II, 16-35mm f/4L IS, 24-105mm f/4L, 50mm f/1.8, 100mm Macro f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L, 580EX-II
flickr