Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: EF 24-105 f/4 L IS USM for general purpose lens

  1. #1
    Junior Member eranda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Jakarta
    Posts
    7

    EF 24-105 f/4 L IS USM for general purpose lens

    i intend to upgrade my kit lens EF-S 18-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS to EF 24-105 f/4 L IS USM, the previous lens helped me well to learn at the first beginning but then I considered the quality so i consider the 24-105, but before i do so I'd to have opinions about this 24-105 for general purpose lens. I mostly make photos on the beach.
    Canon EOS 60D, EF-S 10-22 f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF-S 18-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS, EF 17-40 f/4L USM, EF 70-200 f/2.8L USM

    "enjoy your life, make it colourful"

  2. #2
    Senior Member francongphotography's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Burnaby, British Columbia
    Posts
    118
    Sounds like a good choice to me, since you have your 10-22mm to cover your wide angle, and 70-200 to cover the long end. Since you mostly take pictures on the beach, so I don't think 24-70 f/2.8 would be ideal for your use. I say go with the 24-105! The IS will come in handy.
    Canon 5D Mk II, 550D/T2i, 50mm f/1.4 USM, 100mm f/2.8 L USM, 17-40mm f/4 L USM, 24-105mm f/4 L USM, 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM, 320EX speedlite

    Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/franco_ng/

  3. #3
    Senior Member FastGass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Beautiful Ferndale Washington.
    Posts
    154
    The 24-105mm will not be a very big jump in IQ from your kit lens because it's not optimised for 1.6 crop cameras like your rebel, a much better alternitave is the 17-55mm f/2.8 or 15-85mm. Both are sharper than the L.

    John.
    Amateurs worry about gear, pros about the pay, masters about the light, and I just take pictures!

  4. #4
    Senior Member Dave Throgmartin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Northern Illinois
    Posts
    1,061
    John may be right. It'd be worth taking back to back photos 18-135 versus 24-105 just to make sure you are getting the IQ jump you're after. The 24-105 will probably be significantly sharper in the corners wide open at any focal length.

    Dave

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Posts
    61
    I am sure there are others with more experience regarding the L series sealing characteristics, but I know of people who have had issues with the sand and salt water spray negatively affecting the EF-S (non-weather sealed) lenses. If you are going to be at a beach, it might be a consideration.

    Recently I was able to take some beach shots, and when I got home there was a film of salt spray on my lenses, one was the 24-105 and the other the 70-200. Both cleaned up very easily with a lens wipe, but not sure what the 17-55 would do in the same situation.

    My 17-55 just arrived Friday, so haven't had much time to compare it, but so far it appears nearly identical IQ to my 24-105 and 17-40. My impression so far is that the 17-55 is a lot more fragile than either of the other two L lenses, but takes great pictures!

    I am using a crop sensor camera (60D).

    Hope this helps!
    Brian

  6. #6
    Senior Member conropl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    1,466
    If you do get the 24-105 I am sure it can handle a lot of what you want to do at the beach, but, you may also want to invest in a lens in the 10-20mm range (Sigma or Canon, but the canon is prefered if you have the money). There are some shots that you may want to get were you need the wide angle lens for.

    That is the beauty of the 17-55... it is very sharp, fast, and wider. However, you do need to be careful with the lack of sealing at the beach (bad weather is great for beach shots)

    I find my 24-105 handles most everything I want for landscape on a crop body, but there are a few times when my 10-20mm comes in handy. When I first got the 10-20, I did not use it much, but I find myself using it more and more.

    Pat
    5DS R, 1D X, 7D, Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6, 24mm f/1.4L II, 16-35mm f/4L IS, 24-105mm f/4L, 50mm f/1.8, 100mm Macro f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L, 580EX-II
    flickr

  7. #7
    Administrator Sean Setters's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    3,360
    Quote Originally Posted by conropl View Post
    ...but there are a few times when my 10-20mm comes in handy. When I first got the 10-20, I did not use it much, but I find myself using it more and more.

    Pat
    I have the Canon 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5. I don't use it very often, but when only a wide angle will do, I'm very glad it's in the camera bag.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Dave Johnston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    451
    Incidentaly you can get one at Adorama for 890 with USA warranty and free shipping. That isn't much more expensive than when it comes as a kit. Just food for thought.

    Dave.
    5D mark III, 50D, 17-40 f4L, 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4L ​IS, 28 f1.8, 50 f1.8, 85 f1.8, 100 f2.8 Macro

  9. #9
    Senior Member Photog82's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Maine, USA
    Posts
    321
    I have the 24-105 on my 7D, had it on my 40d and am not sure what people are talking about with the IQ not being very well... don't believe it. It was awesome. Straight from the camera the contrast and sharpness is great! I still sharpen in a bit but it an excellent lens. I've had a couple of recent outings with the lens and what amazes me with it is that I can crop in a lot without affecting the image, unlike my 28-135. Let me know if you want any sample shots.

    I should note that I have the Canon 10-22 lens as well for the times when I need for width.
    --

  10. #10
    Senior Member FastGass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Beautiful Ferndale Washington.
    Posts
    154
    I have seen shots taken by Juza with a 60D and 24-105mm and it was good but not as good as a 17-55mm f/2.8 or 15-85mm, same holds true for the 17-40mm L except its even worst than the kit lens, check the ISO crops. If it's good enough for you thats great but there are sharper options out there if IQ is a deciding factor. FWIW unless you have a weather sealed body weather sealling is negated.

    John.
    Amateurs worry about gear, pros about the pay, masters about the light, and I just take pictures!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •