PDA

View Full Version : Aurora Photography - lessons and learnings



Jonathan Huyer
09-21-2013, 06:12 PM
Viewing the Aurora Borealis (or Aurora Australis for those of you in the southern hemisphere) is an absolute thrill, and I consider it to be one of nature's most amazing spectacles. Capturing a photo is also a thrill, and to do so you need a combination of the right gear, a little bit of knowledge, and a massive amount of luck. I've been out in both the spring and fall for aurora, and learned a fair bit along the way. Here are some of the key items:

- Check the aurora activity. Visit spaceweather.com for aurora forecasts and maps. It is typically possible to get 2-3 days warning of an impending spike in aurora activity, although I have also had great shows on 'quiet' nights. The website is filled with lots of scientific explanations for the aurora, which really appeals to the geek in me. We are near the maximum right now on the 11-year solar cycle, although it is not a particularly strong maximum this time around. Nevertheless, from now until spring the viewing opportunities are going to be very good up north.

- Plan your trip. For me, the easiest place to go for aurora watching is Yellowknife, Northwest Territories. A 2-hour direct flight from Calgary puts you right smack under the aurora oval. You don't have to go far from town to get away from the lights, and the landscape is flat so you have a nice big sky. There are plenty of lakes to give you opportunities for reflection shots in the fall. Yellowknife has a relatively dry climate and the chance for clear skies in the spring and fall are reasonably good.

- Timing. I timed both our spring and fall trips around the new moon. However I've seen plenty of aurora shots taken with the moon out and they also work very well. Spring and fall are the best times to go. In the summer there is too much daylight, and in the winter it is just too darn cold. Even spring was a tad on the chilly side... our first night there in March was -37 C (without adding in the wind chill).

- Camera. This is one area of photography where good gear does make a big difference. A full-frame sensor is the best bet, since it allows higher ISO before noise becomes a problem, and can take advantage of a fast prime lens like the 24 mm f/1.4. If you own a 1DX or a 5D Mark II or III, you'll be extremely pleased with what they can do. I'm sure the 6D will also be excellent for aurora.

- Lenses. The 24 mm f/1.4 prime was pretty much made for aurora photography, in my view. It offers the speed and sharpness you need, and has a wide enough angle when coupled with a full-frame sensor. Often times an even wider angle view is useful, in which case you could add the 14 mm f/2.8 (if money is no object!). I rented that lens once and like it because it doesn't curve the horizon when you tilt it upwards. Personally I'm not too fond of fisheye-type lenses for that reason. Zoom lenses are a very reasonable alternative to the fast expensive primes. The 16-35 f/2.8 is great, and you can even use the 17-40 f/4 quite successfully. In all cases, be sure to remove the UV filter from the front of your lens. Otherwise you will get weird circular patterns on the sky that you can't remove in post processing.

- Tripod. A good steady tripod is a must, and a ball head is ideal. I use the Really Right Stuff L-plate system which allows me to quickly shift between horizontal and vertical orientation, which is very helpful as the aurora changes shape. A leveling indicator is also very useful, if not essential. I used the built-in level on my camera body, but you could also get by with a bubble level on the camera hot shoe.

- Accessories. A cable release is very beneficial, and essential if you plan to make time-lapse movies. Bring a spare battery, and keep it in your pocket if you're shooting in cold weather. The oversize battery on my 1DX lasted just one hour in the -37 C weather, but once I warmed it up it was good to go again. If you're shooting in warmer weather, make sure you have a lens hood on. Otherwise dew can form on the lens and wreck your whole evening. Bring a headlamp, ideally with a red filter on the light. You'll need it as you fumble around for the buttons on your camera. In cold weather, bring a big zip-top bag that you can put your camera in before going indoors, to prevent condensation.

- Image settings: Aurora can move quickly, so it's often best to get as fast a shutter speed as possible. Choose the highest ISO that you can tolerate (trial and error is your best bet here). If you are using a fast prime like the 24 mm f/1.4, I'd suggest stopping it down to f/2.0 to reduce coma and improve sharpness all around. It will still be plenty fast. For f/2.8 or f/4 lenses, I'd suggest going wide open. Then in manual mode, use the histogram to pick your shutter speed. Aurora brightness can vary quickly and tremendously... one minute you can be nailing the exposure, and the next it is completely blown out. Pay close attention to the green channel on the RGB histogram. You want to make absolutely sure that you are not blowing it out (i.e. touching the right side of the chart). Adjust your shutter speed accordingly. For my recent trip to Yellowknife, my most common settings were ISO 1600, 8 seconds at f/2.0. When we were there in the spring, the aurora got so bright on occasion that I could use a 2 second exposure. That was quite handy because the brighter the aurora, the faster they move. Long exposures would produce a big green fuzzball in those circumstances.

- Focusing: It is essential to use live view to get the focus right. Zoom to 10x magnification and adjust the focus until the smallest stars are sharp. Then lock the focus in manual. During the night I would re-check the focus several times to make sure I didn't accidentally bump it.

- Composition: Aurora photography offers great opportunity for generating creative compositions. I've seen awesome shots by other people where they incorporated trees, old buildings, and other such features into their shots. Use your spare time during the day to identify some interesting locations. And be sure to try vertical compositions as well as horizontal.

- Making movies: A fun thing to do with aurora is generating time-lapse videos. It's a piece of cake, really. Just set the camera on continuous drive, and lock down the button on your cable release. I use QuickTime to splice the images together, and a rate of 6 frames per second seems to work reasonably well. You should try to get at least 20-30 minutes of real-life images to create a decent time lapse. A wider-angle lens is often a better bet for time lapse photography, since the aurora can move across the sky rather quickly. The 14 mm f/2.8 prime would be a good one for this.

- Cold weather gear: Shooting at -37 C was outrageously challenging, especially with trying to keep my fingers warm. I found that the best solution was to use chemical heat packs, by the dozen. I had two layers for my hands: A thin glove inside a big fat overmitt. I tied the mitts together through my sleeves so I could pull them off without having to drop them. I used heat packs inside both the thin gloves and the overmitts. It was the only system that worked, but I still had to move very quickly when I pulled off the overmitts to adjust the camera. Taking photos in the fall with temperatures above freezing was so much easier. However we had terrific aurora shows in the spring, and I certainly don't regret going then.

- Post processing: In Lightroom, I might make a minor change to white balance, and add a bit of noise reduction. I also use the clarity slider to make the aurora pop a bit, and sometimes add a small touch of contrast. I don't add vibrance or saturation... I personally think that's cheating.

- Odds: So you've decided to head north (or way south) to see the aurora... what are the chances it will work out? On our trip in March, we saw great aurora on 2 of the 4 nights we were there. One night it was cloudy and one night was just really quiet. On our trip this month, we had a fine show on 3 of the 5 nights, with two of the nights being cloudy. And of the 3 nights that worked, two of those had zero wind so I could get the reflection shot that I so greatly coveted. So I think if you're going to be out there for at least 4 nights, your chances are pretty good you'll see something.

I hope that covers the major points... feel free to ask any questions if there's something that I've missed.

http://www.huyerperspectives.com/Nature/Northern-Lights/i-9P94fb5/0/L/A39Q8794-L.jpg

Kayaker72
09-21-2013, 08:05 PM
Thanks Jonathan. This is definitely on my list of things to do.

DavidWare
09-25-2013, 10:20 PM
I need to hit the lottery, then I'll come up and join you for a shoot ;)
Great information though, and incredible shot.

NFLD Stephen
09-26-2013, 04:16 PM
Great writeup Jonathan! You mention to remove the UV filter to avoid weird circular patterns...any idea what this is or what causes it? Do you have a picture with this pattern you could share as an explaination?

Stephen

Jonathan Huyer
09-26-2013, 09:53 PM
Thanks Stephen. I don't actually know why UV filters do that to night images, and I'd be very interested if someone has the answer. I don't have any examples myself because I was warned about it ahead of time by a pro, so I always shoot with bare glass at night. However I did see a photo taken by somebody else, who didn't know about this problem and left his filter on. He was pretty dejected that all his aurora shots for that night were wrecked.

yorick
09-29-2013, 08:58 AM
Thanks for the lessons. I'm planning a trip this winter (in Norwey) so this is very useful to know. From the "Image settings" paragraph, I suppose that you are shooting in Manual mode.

I already own a 16-35 f/2.8L and a 5DIII but I've been considering buying or renting a 24 f/1.4L. I would have a better image quality with the 24 (but possibly not a lot better). Is it worth gaining 1 or 2 stops and the a-bit-better-image-quality by getting the 24 f/1.4L (this lens would anyway be reused after the aurora trip) ?

Photog82
09-29-2013, 04:15 PM
Thank you for taking the time to write this, this is something I've always wanted to do and have wondered how to capture them as I've never seen it in real life. Excellent photo by the way.

Jonathan Huyer
10-01-2013, 12:36 AM
Thanks for the lessons. I'm planning a trip this winter (in Norwey) so this is very useful to know. From the "Image settings" paragraph, I suppose that you are shooting in Manual mode.

I already own a 16-35 f/2.8L and a 5DIII but I've been considering buying or renting a 24 f/1.4L. I would have a better image quality with the 24 (but possibly not a lot better). Is it worth gaining 1 or 2 stops and the a-bit-better-image-quality by getting the 24 f/1.4L (this lens would anyway be reused after the aurora trip) ?

Yes that's right, I shoot in manual mode as I'm pretty sure the light meter would be inaccurate with aurora. The 24 f/1.4 is a superb lens but it also costs a lot and might be pretty hard to justify if you already have the 16-35 f/2.8 LII. If you have the version I of that lens (like I do) then you might not be as happy with it at night. Definitely having a fast shutter speed helps a lot with aurora, if you happen to get lucky and have an evening where the lights take off. When they start to move, they go very quickly and display gorgeous filaments. At slow shutter speeds (greater than 4 sec) these details end up as blobs of green and red... still very pretty but not a good capture of what you see in real life. Of course the 5D3 can also be cranked up to high ISO, which is definitely worth doing to improve the speed. But try it at a variety of settings and decide for yourself how high you want to go.

Hope that helps!

yorick
10-02-2013, 07:27 AM
Thanks. I have the second version of the 16-35, so I'll see if I can find a good second-hand 24 f/1.4L II (which would be less expensive than a new one).

conropl
10-03-2013, 01:54 AM
Thanks. I have the second version of the 16-35, so I'll see if I can find a good second-hand 24 f/1.4L II (which would be less expensive than a new one).
You could rent the 24 for your trip... unless you think you will use it a lot after the trip.

qwRad
10-03-2013, 04:36 AM
Thanks for the great guide. Unfortunately it was mostly cloudy last week when I was in Lapland. A few stars were visible on the first two nights but no aurora. But I will be going again in December so will try again then.

conropl
10-07-2013, 01:09 AM
Jonathan:

Your camera has menu setting of "Long exp. noise reduction" and "High ISO speed NR". Do you turn these off?

Pat

Jonathan Huyer
10-07-2013, 03:32 AM
Jonathan:

Your camera has menu setting of "Long exp. noise reduction" and "High ISO speed NR". Do you turn these off?

Pat

Pat - You will generally want to turn off the long exposure noise reduction, since that will delay the interval time that you can take photos. I believe the noise reduction takes the same length of time as the original shot, so it will affect your time-lapse shots the most. In addition, when the aurora starts to take off you will want to take photos as fast as possible, and having to wait for the noise reduction to do its thing would be frustrating. I believe the High ISO speed NR impacts JPEG files only (please correct me if I'm wrong here). I just leave it on the default setting but I shoot in Raw only, and do my own noise reduction with Lightroom.

conropl
10-07-2013, 04:57 PM
...I believe the High ISO speed NR impacts JPEG files only (please correct me if I'm wrong here). I just leave it on the default setting but I shoot in Raw only, and do my own noise reduction with Lightroom.

Thanks for the response. I agree on the first point, and I just leave long exposure NR off. But I was not sure if the high ISO NR effected RAW or just jpeg. I made the assumption it only effected jpeg's so I left it off, and assumed I would take care of it in post (I only shot RAW). Looks like I guessed correctly (I will confirm this to be the case with the manual).

Again, thanks for sharing your knowledge.

Pat

Jonathan Huyer
10-07-2013, 05:42 PM
No worries! And again congrats on the successful aurora shot. When you're using the 1DX, it's a bit of a case of "Noise? What noise?" :cool:

conropl
10-08-2013, 01:30 AM
No worries! And again congrats on the successful aurora shot. When you're using the 1DX, it's a bit of a case of "Noise? What noise?" :cool:

Thanks Jonathan. I used a 1DX:cool:, but the Aurora was not as intense as yours, so it took 15 seconds, ISO 3200, f/2. So even with the 1DX it was still a bit noisy. It mostly cleaned up, but I am not sure it would be good enough for a large print. I had to update to Lightroom 5 from LR3 to be able to process the files... which left me a little in the dark trying figure out where I needed to set the sliders on LR (the LR5 settings are completely different from LR3), but I will work that out.

Unfortunately, I have to send the 1DX back because there were to many dead pixels (I quit counting at 70):mad:. The first shot out of the box showed red, white, and blue dots even at an 8 second exposure. I should be able to swap it out for a new one tomorrow.

I had another question if you do not mind:confused:. I also have a 24mm f/1.4L II, but the corners are not good at all. Is that normal? It has a strange distortion in the corners. The stars in the corner of night shots look like they are smeared radially about the center of the sensor... so they look like elongated stars that come to a point at each end (especially in the upper right corner). I am going to see how it looks with a different body, and then decide what to do with the lens.

Other than the dead pixels... what a great camera. I hate to send it back.

Pat

Poik
10-08-2013, 11:47 AM
Unfortunately, I have to send the 1DX back because there were to many dead pixels (I quit counting at 70):mad:. The first shot out of the box showed red, white, and blue dots even at an 8 second exposure. I should be able to swap it out for a new one tomorrow.
I had the same problem when I bought my 7D, and was REALLY upset about it because I didn't know if I would be able to return it. I did some reading and found that running the manual sensor clean option for a minute or two most times fixes the "dead" pixels. The regular sensor clean didn't fix the issue for me, but when I did the manual sensor clean and let it sit for a couple minutes, then turned it off and back on, my hot pixels were nice and black. Maybe give it a shot on yours.

Busted Knuckles
10-08-2013, 11:56 AM
I had another question if you do not mind:confused:. I also have a 24mm f/1.4L II, but the corners are not good at all. Is that normal? It has a strange distortion in the corners. The stars in the corner of night shots look like they are smeared radially about the center of the sensor... so they look like elongated stars that come to a point at each end (especially in the upper right corner). I am going to see how it looks with a different body, and then decide what to do with the lens.
\
Pat

Would you predict the distortion from the ISO charts? look at the box/lines and the corners of the box might give you a preview of the radial smear.- there is some pretty weak quality wide open a even at 2.0 on the corners. Just my two pennies.

Kayaker72
10-08-2013, 01:27 PM
I had another question if you do not mind:confused:. I also have a 24mm f/1.4L II, but the corners are not good at all. Is that normal? It has a strange distortion in the corners. The stars in the corner of night shots look like they are smeared radially about the center of the sensor... so they look like elongated stars that come to a point at each end (especially in the upper right corner).

Pat

Are you seeing coma? I've heard it is common on wide angle lenses shot wide open.

conropl
10-08-2013, 06:41 PM
I had the same problem when I bought my 7D, and was REALLY upset about it because I didn't know if I would be able to return it. I did some reading and found that running the manual sensor clean option for a minute or two most times fixes the "dead" pixels. The regular sensor clean didn't fix the issue for me, but when I did the manual sensor clean and let it sit for a couple minutes, then turned it off and back on, my hot pixels were nice and black. Maybe give it a shot on yours.

I tried that, and it did nothing. The other problem I have is that there are so bad pixels right out of the box, and by performing the "re-mapping" process, I believe all you are doing is turning them off. I could send it to Canon, and they would map and turn off the offending pixels, or I can swap it out for a new one. I chose the new one because it is easier. You will get dead/hot pixels over time, and I expect it; but I do not want to start with 70-100 coming out of the box and then it only gets worse from there. And sending it to Canon and being without a camera that long did not appeal to me. There was also a drop of oil or water vapor inside the view finder that has since disapeared to somewhere inside the camera.


Would you predict the distortion from the ISO charts? look at the box/lines and the corners of the box might give you a preview of the radial smear.- there is some pretty weak quality wide open a even at 2.0 on the corners. Just my two pennies.

I do not think the 24 looked that bad in the corners on a full frame stopped down one stop in the charts (I will look closer though). I am not sure whether this is a lens issue or a sensor issue. I will be picking up a new camera today after work, and I will find out from there. If it does prove to be a lens issue, then I will have to start investigating it. If it is normal, then I will have to decide if I want to live with it or not. It is really kind of ugly, and would be very noticble if I printed at 16"X24".


Are you seeing coma? I've heard it is common on wide angle lenses shot wide open.

Coma wide open is bad, but once you get to f/2 it cleans up nicely. I assumed I would need to stop down one stop anyway, so I think it looks good as far as coma is concerned provided it is stopped down that one stop.

Jonathan Huyer
10-09-2013, 05:27 PM
Hi Pat - Your photo at f/2 looks pretty similar to what I get with that lens. Yes there is coma in the corners, and it shows up as radial streaks through the stars. After seeing how bad it was at f/1.4, I was actually quite pleased with the performance at f/2. I have another chance at northern aurora photography in a few weeks, and if I get bright lights then I will try shooting at f/2.8 and even f/4 to see the difference. But the coma at f/2 doesn't bother me at all... it's a negligible tradeoff for the ability to shoot at a faster shutter speed.

For reference, here is the Perseid meteor shot that I posted a while ago, taken at f/1.4. This shot is uncropped, so you can see the extent of the coma in the corners. Since then I shoot at f/2.
2019

conropl
10-09-2013, 09:11 PM
Hi Pat - Your photo at f/2 looks pretty similar to what I get with that lens. Yes there is coma in the corners, and it shows up as radial streaks through the stars. After seeing how bad it was at f/1.4, I was actually quite pleased with the performance at f/2. I have another chance at northern aurora photography in a few weeks, and if I get bright lights then I will try shooting at f/2.8 and even f/4 to see the difference. But the coma at f/2 doesn't bother me at all... it's a negligible tradeoff for the ability to shoot at a faster shutter speed.

For reference, here is the Perseid meteor shot that I posted a while ago, taken at f/1.4. This shot is uncropped, so you can see the extent of the coma in the corners. Since then I shoot at f/2.


Thanks for the input, and I think it matches what Busted Knuckles pointed out as well. I wanted to get my mind calibrated on what was normal. I can see you have the same issue at f/1.4, and it sounds like at f/2 as well (just to a lesser extent). So I am probably being a little over picky. I will have a little time tonight to play around with it tonight, and I have a replacement camera in hand also.

But overall... the camera and lens are great, and the night time ability met my expectations. Wow... what a differece from the 7D in all aspects (not just in its low light capability). It is amazing how many stars show up with a relitively short shutter speed.

Thanks all for the comments and suggestions.

Pat