Re: 70-200 2.8 IS from 2003
Something like that I'd want to take a few shots on a FF body before spending that much sight unseen.
Nnew glass price should drop to ~$1650 come September ( canonrumors.com ).
Re: 70-200 2.8 IS from 2003
15% off for a 5-year old lens? I wouldn't pay that much for a 5 *month* old lens. (Unless it was a manual focus only lens.) As for value, a thing is worth whatever someone will pay for it.
Re: 70-200 2.8 IS from 2003
that's what I thought too. thanks for the input, gentlemen.
Re: 70-200 2.8 IS from 2003
What would be a fair price for this lens in "excellent" condition?
Re: 70-200 2.8 IS from 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triple Black 88
What would be a fair price for this lens in "excellent" condition?
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>
It's different for everyone. On e-bay, they sell for more than they cost brand new. On Craigslist, usually ~10% off. For you, a fair price is whatever you are willing to pay for it.
Personally, I would want 30-40% off to persuade me from just buying new. The I.S. will start to die eventually. With a heavily used lens it will be sooner than one that is only seeing action for a few hours a week. If I knew for certain (somehow) that the lens was well cared for (perfect collimation), and used only lightly, then I would buy it for 15-20% off.
Re: 70-200 2.8 IS from 2003
I think the person is asking too much if the lens is 6 years old. Most of the camera shops in Asia would take 20% off the original price if you trade a one - two year old lens then purchase a new one. The lens does hold it's value.
Re: 70-200 2.8 IS from 2003
The best way to find out what You should pay is to find out, what others got for their lenses at eBay. If the price is not higher than what You can get if You resale the lens (and the lens is in good condition), I would have no problem to buy it!