Used to be, I needed a box of tissue handy when watching a sad movie ...now I need one when I look at photos like this!
www.popphoto.com/.../two-reuters-photographers-use-110-pounds-camera-gear-to-shoot-royal-wedding
Printable View
Used to be, I needed a box of tissue handy when watching a sad movie ...now I need one when I look at photos like this!
www.popphoto.com/.../two-reuters-photographers-use-110-pounds-camera-gear-to-shoot-royal-wedding
Based on the title I was expecting food.
I
A whole bunch of Canon gear...and a Nikon monopod. [^o)]
Having a 70-200mm f/2.8L, and knowing it's size and bulk...the pair of them sure look tiny on that bed by comparison!
I think that gear cost more than the Royal Wedding.
And no short primes? Well I guess you have to be practical as well, but I still think they should have the Magic Canon Ball in there.
John.
2 x 500mm, 1x 400mm, 1 x 300mm and 1 x 600mm?
I think some are older versions?
I guess pro's don't worry about dust on their sensors, only one body appears to have a cap on it.
A little redundancy ya think. I guess one could find a purpose to tote all that around.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tkerr
Finding a purpose is easy. Finding a helper to carry them for you is the trick. Thats two photographers gear, I would think they would have at least 1 assistant apiece, if not two.
I am thinking to move fast, most of their lenses are going to already be mounted to a body ready to go.
But with just 1 monopod which guy has to hand hold?
Wow, Looks almost as good as John's (Neuro's) kit [;)]. My guess is there is at least another20 or 30pounds not shown because there wasn't enough room on the bed,i.e. batteries, cards, light stands,and probably a tripod or two, sure glad i am not the apprentice that has to haul all of that stuff around.