Zeiss 100mm f/2.0 Makro-Planar T* ZE Lens Review

Discuss theZeiss 100mm f/2.0 Makro-Planar T* ZE Lens Review - tell us what you think of theZeiss 100mm f/2.0 Makro-Planar T* ZE Lens.

I think there is a typo in the "reproduction ratios" picture of the iris. Shouldn

Thanks John - I

I

Don

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jon Ruyle

<div id="ctl00_ctl00_content_content_ctl00_fragment_121 6_ctl01_ctl00_PostForm__QuoteText"]


Don't 10 wk old nieces move? How do you focus? :)


I wish the canon was f/2, or that the zeiss had autofocus. I guess nothing is perfect.
</div>

---

Jon


2 1/2 month old babies don't run away. Or crawl away for that matter. [:P]

I have thought about this lens. And own the 180mm L Macro and the 100mm L IS Macro.


But the real question I had reading the review, is trying to figure out if this lens is going to give me something the other two do not.

• It appears that the Ziess is better built.
• You can go down to F2, but for Macro I am not sure this is really needed.
• The bokeh does not appear to be significantly better
• Manual focus is not a big deal to me with this lens because macro is usually manual focus any way for what I would do with it.

Fromother reviews I have read about this lens, I was expecting to hear more positives about IQ compared to the Canon's. But after reading this I was left asking would I really see any improvement. The side by side comparison that Bryan usually puts at the end of a review was geared more toward the way the lens functions and not the differences in quality of picture. Which at this level of lens, maybe those differences aren't significant?

I agree. With f/2 and great IQ, I thought maybe this lens could possibly simultaneously fill the rolls of the 100 macro and the 135 f/2. But the fact that it only goes to 0.5x really makes it less desirable to me as a macro lens.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HDNitehawk

I was expecting to hear more positives about IQ compared to the Canon's. But after reading this I was left asking would I really see any improvement.

---

I've never used the lens, but looking at Bryan's images it looks like the Zeiss has a real IQ edge at f/2 in the corners over anything canon makes (except the 200 f/2 of course), but stopped down as you would use a macro the canon seems to have the sharpness edge. Based on the flimsy evidence of the single picture in Bryan's review, I actually prefer the canon bokek. Of course there is mystical "Zeiss look", but I haven't been able to isolate that (though I make no claim that it does not exist)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jon Ruyle

I've never used the lens, but looking at Bryan's images it looks like the Zeiss has a real IQ edge at f/2 in the corners over anything canon makes (except the 200 f/2 of course), but stopped down as you would use a macro the canon seems to have the sharpness edge. Based on the flimsy evidence of the single picture in Bryan's review, I actually prefer the canon bokek. Of course there is mystical "Zeiss look", but I haven't been able to isolate that (though I make no claim that it does not exist)

---

Really I had the same impression about the bokeh, the canon 100mm was better. But they were similar, and if they are similar the Zeiss will loose against the 180mm L as I find it better than canons 100mm.


I had been waiting for Bryan to review this lens for some time. I was hoping for something along the line of the "Mystical Zeiss look" but it wasn't there. I guess that look is like a unicorn, they are rare and you don't see them very often.

I've had a similar impression reading the review and.playing with the ISO 12233 charts comparing the Zeiss to the Canon 100 mm L.Both look like excellent lenses but with IS, AF, 1:1 and the red ring negating the "Zeiss look" my impression is that the 100L is a better lens.


It is slight, but a quick example:


www.the-digital-picture.com/.../ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx


Looking at a couple of these, I would favor canon from f/2.8 through f/5.6 and the Zeiss, due to the edges at f/8. But, as a crop sensor user, I don't use the edges...