I do not want to start a riot...or be stoned to death...but question: anyone using both Canon and Nikon gear? .....

1) I have quite a few customers who are professional photographers and they all use/recommendeither Canon or Hasselblad. I couldn't afford the latter[:(]. My experience with Nikon is pretty limited though: I have a D40 at work and played with my friend's D200 on several occasions.


2)Both Canon and Nikon systems are easy to use, one can adapt easily.


3)For the lenses I've tested, I amby no meansa pixel peeper, butthey certainlyget the job done.


4)There is one thing that sometimes drives me crazy: when a newly taken photograph shows up on your LCD screen, the only thing you can do is to look at it. You have to press play in order to magnify or compare with previously taken pictures.


In conclusion, each system has its pros and cons. I personaly like diversity. It would suck if allmanufacturers were making identical models of cameras..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by piiooo

4)There is one thing that sometimes drives me crazy: when a newly taken photograph shows up on your LCD screen, the only thing you can do is to look at it. You have to press play in order to magnify or compare with previously taken pictures.

---

Yeah, that drives me nuts too! Forgot about that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BES

1) Why did you decide to go with Canon/Nikon?


2) Which one do you find easier to use?


3) Lens quality? Which one do you prefer...C vs N...if you care to go into description and comparison or just any rationale will do.


4)which features from Nikon would you like to see on your Canon? Or vice versa

---

<p class="MsoNormal"]<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"]1) I learned to use an SLR on my dad's AE-1.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"] He always shot Canon, my grandfather always shot Canon.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"] When my dad would upgrade bodies, he would give me his old ones.
<p class="MsoNormal"]<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"]2) I can't say because I haven't toyed around too much with Nikon bodies.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"] From what I read, Canon has a slight edge in the user interface but not enough to make much of a difference.
<p class="MsoNormal"]<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"]<o:p></o:p>
<p class="MsoNormal"]<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"]3) Again, little Nikon experience but from what I read I'd say Canon has the edge.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"] Also, look at the sidelines at <st1:place w:st="on"]Wimbledon</st1:place>, The World Series, The Super Bowl, etc...you tend to see a lot of white lenses out there!<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"] The other thing is, Canon seems to have more offerings...there's no Nikkor 50mm f/1.2 or 85mm f/1.2 or others.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"] They tend to cost about 5%-15% more than Canon's too!<o:p></o:p>
<p class="MsoNormal"]<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"]
<p class="MsoNormal"]<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"]4) Like ShutterbugJohan said:
<p class="MsoNormal"]<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"]<o:p></o:p>

• 
  <div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"]<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"]Weathersealing on x0D series and 5D series--like Nikon's D300 and D700 <o:p></o:p></div>
  
• 
  <div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"]<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"]More AF points on x0D series and 5D series--like Nikon's D300 and D700 <o:p></o:p></div>
  
• 
  <div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"]<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"]100% viewfinder coverage on x0D series and 5D series--like Nikon's D300. <o:p></o:p></div>
  
• 
  <div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"]<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"]More switches (like Nikon) for things such as drive mode and (maybe) metering.<o:p></o:p></div>
  
• 
  <div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"]<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"]Instant switching from AF to MF by turning the focus ring</div>
  

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ShutterbugJohan

Instant switching from AF to MF by turning the focus ring. With Canon's full-time-manual focusing available on USM lenses, you must either let the camera finish focusing or hit the focus lock (see my previous point). With Nikon, you can twist the focus ring even during focusing, and the focus motor will stop as if by magic--letting you adjust focus immediately. (I tried it out on the 70-200/2.8 VR. Awesome!)

---

I forgot to mention that this feature is only available on their lenses that feature M and M/A focusing. Their more inexpensive lenses feature M and A focusing, in which this does not work (as far as I know).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ShutterbugJohan

Ability to assign one button to lock both the exposure and focus--at the same time. I find it annoying to only have one function available at any time.

---

You can do this in Canon, under custom functions. Its under the AF custom fuction menu.You can also set it to Back Button Focus so your shutter is only good for expouser and triggering the camera while the * button is for focus.

I went with canon because back in the day I heard the rebel xt was better than what Nikon was offering at the time. I've stayed with canon because I have too much canon gear to switch without a very very good reason.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ShutterbugJohan

More AF points on x0D series and 5D series--like Nikon's D300 and D700

---

This is *the* big issue for me. What I want most is a full frame camera with a high end autofocus. Not just more af points, but faster and better tracking and low light performance. Canon makes such a thing, sure, but it costs $7000. With nikon, you can get it for $2400. *Big* difference.


That said, the 5DII has its strong points over the D700... greater pixel count, movies, and um... there must be *something* else... [:)]

1) My dad also had an AE-1 (which is what got me into photography) so I kept with Canon b/c it was familiar.


2) For most things, Canon... don't have a lot of Nikon experience either mind you


3) I've heard people say that Nikon's wider lenses have an edge over Canon and vice-versa for tele's, but have not experienced this personally....


4) - OC-E3 (off camera shoe cord) with a damned focus-assist beam built into the camera mount end!!!!!


- Gel holder built into the higher end flashes (at LEAST the 580II's)


- More focus points on the mid level bodies


- FTM actually being FTM :P

Photographers I knew had Canon for digital.


I got a Canon point and shoot based on a public radio interview.... Got to know it and like it.


Ex had a Canon 20D that she bought with our medical insurance money. When my P&amp;S drowned in the ocean, Canon got kudos from her photography teacher, and I figured (thinking at the time we were going to be married), why not have the same platform and be able to share lenses....


I don't think anything bad about Nikon based on what I know, but I've come to know Canon, and have been very happy with their products and their company, overall. Much better choice in cameras than prior relationships [:)] At least when a camera decides that it doesn't want to be your camera anymore, it doesn't sue you.

Awww, Colin, you are funny[:D]


I hope your current or future beau will have the same appreciation for the fine art of photography as you do. We have an agreement with my husband that I have to learn (means spend $$$) photography to keep my sanity, it is my de-stressor and complete fun thing to do. He is completely not into it, but I stay away from his music collection and thousand of CDs and God knows how many Ipods [:)] Hey, everyone has to have their thing and space!


I got into Canon because I had PS before and my friend was buying 40D so I decided to go with this one. Like every woman, I had a terrible time deciding what to get, N vs C, but went with Canon as I figured I knew squat about photography so I hoped to lear about the camera from my friend. Now I spend time on this forum inhaling information from all of you great guys, totally envious of your knowledge and images you post.


It may be my weird impression, but I tend to notice that Canon zooms produce a bit sharper images, but then again, I am not specialist, maybe it is someone post-processing boo-boos.


I wish though Canon took the stupid dial on the back of the body and moved it up , like Nikon, it would be more ergonomic. I would like the button for continuous shooting like Nikon has it, rather than having to set it. And the issue with flash...a tad more solid mount would be peachy...

We have a guy that shoots for our mag that shoots Nikon. He uses the Nikon 28-70 2.8 and his images are always soft, then he over sharpens them in post. It is so funny, he'll shoot portraits and the eyes will be blurry. Drives me crazy, the editor thinks he so great. Might not be the lens, he probably just sucks.


I read somewhere here that Nikon's wides are supposed to be better. I have read a few reviews that were quite the contrary. I've seen the 16-35 mkII beat out the Nikon 17-35 in more than one review, based on equivalent sharpness but superior low distortion over the Nikon. I hear the 12-24 Nikon is quite good though.