Re: "Dumb IS" and monopods
I'm in the "majority" boat by the looks of things as I use IS all the time except when mounted to a tripod (or when using a lens without IS [;)] )
Quote:
Originally Posted by photosurfer
Although i'm sure you do get a lot of people here trying to use IS at 1/2000 while sports shooting so i see what you're saying lol
I understand that IS doesn't add any benefit in terms of camera shake once you reach high shutter speeds, but will leavingIS on while shooting at high shutter speeds actually be detrimental to the shot?
At what point (shutter speed) does IS become useless?
Cheers.
Re: "Dumb IS" and monopods
Depends on how steady you are. I rarely shoot below 250 for sports and have no IS.
I find that IS also tends to shorten battery life.
Re: "Dumb IS" and monopods
Quote:
Originally Posted by btaylor
will leavingIS on while shooting at high shutter speeds actually be detrimental to the shot?
In addition to the battery drain, it can cause its own blur if you happen to take the picture while the I.S. lens group is moving.
Quote:
Originally Posted by btaylor
At what point (shutter speed) does IS become useless?
I turn it off for anything above 1/500.
"Because it tends to be counterproductive above 1/500. Everyone seems
to think that VR has an infinite cycling time. It doesn't. It's
sampling frequency is just above 1/500. Most pros turn it off for
sports. "
http://www.bythom.com/discipline.htm
"VR off. In fast action, there is no time for the VR to settle, and
it will still be "VRing" while you're taking the picture. Fighting you,
rather than helping you. "
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1034&message=31828838
Re: "Dumb IS" and monopods
Thanks Yoda! [Y] Can always count on you for an answer Daniel. I'll have to do some field testing and see the differences for myself.