Wanted to buy: 200m 2.0 prime (out of produciton)

iND,


KEH has two in stock....... http://www.keh.com/Product-Details/1/CE06999049055R/CE06/FE.aspx


Show us some shots....[Y]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Daniel Browning

I can't speak for iND, but one reason that I want it is bokeh. The 200mm f/1.8 is soft because it has intentionally undercorrected spherical aberration, which greatly enhances bokeh at the cost of some sharpness, similar to the 50mm f/1.2.
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>

---

How on earth do you find all of this out? I've heard of "connections", but wow.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by peety3

How on earth do you find all of this out?

---

Easy. I read it on the internet, so it must be true. [;)] I saw a star test of the 200mm f/1.8 (I can't find it now), and the Point Spread looked like negative spherical aberration. I learned that such aberrations enhance bokeh when I was researching the 50mm f/1.2.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Daniel Browning

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by peety3

How on earth do you find all of this out?

---

Easy. I read it on the internet, so it must be true. [img]/emoticons/emotion-5.gif[/img] I saw a star test of the 200mm f/1.8 (I can't find it now), and the Point Spread looked like [url="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f4/Spherical-aberration-disk.jpg]negative spherical aberration[/url]. I learned that such aberrations enhance bokeh when I was researching the 50mm f/1.2.
<div style="CLEAR: both"]</div>

---

Very Cool...[H]