One of my HDR's....the originals: Normal exposure, -2 exposure, +2 exposure
http://www.actieinbeeld.nl/tdp/hdroriginals.jpg
http://www.actieinbeeld.nl/tdp/hdrpost.jpg
Printable View
One of my HDR's....the originals: Normal exposure, -2 exposure, +2 exposure
http://www.actieinbeeld.nl/tdp/hdroriginals.jpg
http://www.actieinbeeld.nl/tdp/hdrpost.jpg
Jan, Very nice shot.
Here is one of my first successful HDR shots. If I recall, It ranged from +2 to -4ev, 7 shots
[img]/resized-image.ashx/__size/800x0/__key/CommunityServer-Discussions-Components-Files/13/2185.HDR-Contact-Sheet.jpg[/img]
And the Final product---Sorry to those that have seen this before.
http://rwilliamsimaging.com/img/s5/v4/p83817596-4.jpg
Does this count?
[img]/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer-Components-UserFiles/00-00-00-47-09/2122.jpg[/img]
After
[img]/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer-Components-UserFiles/00-00-00-47-09/Colored-Pencil.jpg[/img]
Here's couple of my horrendous goofs from the other day at the zoo! It's the result of going from sun to shade to sun to in a building to outside all day long, after awhile I lost track of my settings and almost of my toddler grandchild![:O]
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1433/...aac26eb8c9.jpghttp://farm5.static.flickr.com/4022/...697697c808.jpg
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4054/...9b49e0b7ba.jpghttp://farm5.static.flickr.com/4145/...ef4ae05d2f.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDNitehawk
Ok, Nitehawk, What did you do here and why? Just curious[*-)]---I am guessing I just became the victim of a joke
Bob
Denise, Very nice recovery on both images
Denise, Very nice recovery on both images
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Williams
Nah no joke...it was photoshop CS4, colored pencil. Maybe not what OP had in mind. It looks really cool printed off but shrinking it down to post here takes away from it.
Of course, I like it as a picture more. Other than maybe setting the picture style, it came out of the camera just as it looks now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDNitehawk
Oh, OK,----Well, your right it probably doesn't look as good on screen as it did printed---But, If you could brighten the butterfly and increase vibrance a bit, itmight be a pretty cool shot even on screen. Just my 2cw
Thanks for sharing,
Bob
<div>
The image I used as an example of backfocusing in the AFMA thread seems like a good candidate for this one as well (the size reduction here masks the fact that the focal plane is behind the eye, despite using spot AF on the eye). It was shot with the 70-300mm DO lens, which due to the diffractive optics really benefits from increasing both the contrast and the sharpness during post processing. I also cropped and changed the orientation, and pushed the saturation a bit to brighten the subject and also add some 'pop' to the little ladybug on the underside of the lily pad.
Before: [img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer-Components-UserFiles/00-00-00-35-15/FrogBefore.jpg[/img]
After: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4095/...3480c87f_z.jpg
</div>