interesting... i'll think about it ;) what condition, and would you be able to post to Aus?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Elberson
Printable View
interesting... i'll think about it ;) what condition, and would you be able to post to Aus?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Elberson
Sent you a PMQuote:
Originally Posted by wildstraw
Canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS mkI bought, ill repost when i get my hands on it! Thanks guys!
I've used a 70-200/4 and a 70-200/2.8, both non-IS. the /4 is a wonderfully sharp lens, and weighs next to nothing. the /2.8, though, is great for low light, and lets you blur the background more. the /2.8 (non-IS) is on ebay for around $1100. the 200/2.8 prime is reallllly a sweet lens, though i let mine go because i needed more flexibility.
The 2.8 is an awesome lens, but I personally went with the f/4 IS. To me the IS was much more important than getting one extra stop. I guess it really depends on what you're shooting. With such a large lens as the f/2.8 (if you're shooting hand-held), definitely go with IS. However, the 2.8 IS is considerably more expensive than the f/4 IS.
Mi interessa 70-200 f/4 L IS USM
Qualcuno puo dirmi come va
grazie