Printable View
A few MTF comparisons, taken from canon japan.
Attachment 3048
Another interesting point: 24-105 f/2.8 - 11 aperture blades; EF 24-70 II and RF 24-70 - 9.
The bokeh and rendering I am seeing from that lens is stellar. Some features are complete overkill for me, but....I use an EF 500 II to take photos of birds in my backyard...so, you know, par for the course. :cool:
That looks really good to me!
On the long end...
Attachment 3051
So, I know Canon changed their MTF process a few years ago, given that these do not have f/8, as the old MTFs did and they were taken directly off Canon-Japan's website, I think they are current. But, I am surprised that the 100-400 II the blue line at 400 mm (30 lp/mm) is higher than the 100-500.
And finally...if anyone is discounting the RFs 10-18
Attachment 3046
vs the EFm 11-22
Attachment 3047
Not a bad little lens, especially for the money. 7 aperture blades. That is one of my issues with the less expensive lenses, but you aren't buying that lens for pretty bokeh.