Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith B
Impressive. Does your copy have a lot of CA at f/1.2? Mine sure does. Not so bad that it would be apparent in this pic, but it is often quite apparent.
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith B
Impressive. Does your copy have a lot of CA at f/1.2? Mine sure does. Not so bad that it would be apparent in this pic, but it is often quite apparent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Lee
Nice!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Ruyle
Thanks. In all honesty the 85L is the sharpest, most vivid lens I have ever shot with.
It does have a bit of CA wide open (not as bad as my 35L though). I haven't experienced train wreck CA like I have seen others. I guess it is entirely possible I have a (dern near) perfect copy.
And maybe my 50 f/1.4 is better than some.
When I get some time I'll post pics from my 85 to give an idea of sharpness and CA as a comparison to yours.
I'll say this: Ken Rockell's suggestion that the 85 f/1.2 be used wide open for astrophotography is seems even more laughable to me now than when I first read it (before I tried the 85 f/1.2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Lee
Thanks for replying Chuck. I know what the norm is, but I just didn't like 50mm on a crop-camera at all. Of course at the time I was using the 50mm 1.8 which I didn't like anyway. But honestly I really like the 50mm on full frame. It totally madesense to me why this was "the" standard lens for 35mm camera's. I haven't used an 85mm lens on full frame yet, but I must say that the 100mm macro is also a very nice portrait lens [A]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Lee
Well...safe isn't always exiting is it? [:P]
Ps: welcome back [Y]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jan "Sheiky" Paalman
I think it's a little bit of both
I see. I think f2 is my favorite aperture for my 50mm 1.4. For the same reasons ;)