Printable View
I am hopefully going to the Milwaukee Auto Show next month and being a newbie at photography, it will be myfirst timetaking pictures there!
I would love to see photos anyone may have of cars whether there vintage, hot rod muscle cars (racing or not), last years car showor your own vehicle!
Thanks,
Denise
[img]/resized-image.ashx/__size/600x400/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.26.38/IMG_5F00_4464.JPG[/img]
Hi Denise,
This was taken a while ago at one of the first weddings I did, could be better. I believe this is known as a dog nose shot, don't quote me on that, but it is a bit different I guess for this muscle car. Cheers
Scott
Here's a few of my favorite car shots (not including the racing stuff)
http://www.adprphoto.com/img/v8/p322419918-4.jpg
http://www.adprphoto.com/img/v6/p68499338-4.jpg
whoa...Is that an SLR McLaren?
nice shots, again!
brendan
what are you planning on using for the show? (lens, etc)
Wow! The photo of the two cars is awesome!!! Fantastic shot!
Quote:
Originally Posted by bburns223
To be honest I've been thinking about that on and off all day ...at this point with my current gear, I have no clue! With you and my daughter keeping my sensibility in check about buying anymore lenses right now while I'm still saving for that darn tripod, it's going to be really tough...but I have been eyeing Ebayfor a good auction deal! [;)] Just the other day, a Canon Ef 24-105mm f/4L IS got away from me for $400 (that or a Canon 17-55mm would be nice)!
Denise
I like this angle! Living in AMC/Chrysler town, I plan on taking photos of a lot of local outdoor car shows this coming summer! I wish I never sold my '69 AMX now, I could enter it and take photos! But since it didn't have a back seat, I had to sell it when my daughter was born. [:(]Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott
XTi, 1/125, 24-105 @ 45mm, f11, ISO 200, 580EX
[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.24.67/Image250.jpg[/img]
Quote:
Originally Posted by bburns223
Yup, it's a heritage shot, the original 300SLR and the new SLR McLaren.
and BTW they are models [;)]
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddt0725
It's worth it. You can't spend $1100 in photography for anything better. If I were you I wouldn't buy more lenses. But that's just me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddt0725
I can't tell you for sure, but that lens is probably either a bad copy, in poor physical condition, or the whole deal is a scam. Avoid "ridiculous" pricing. If it seems to good to be true, it is [:D]
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddt0725
I'd use your 55-250 and 300 f/4. Your 100 is too short. The 300 f/4 is a bit too long, but has Mode 2 (panning) IS. However, I would use the 55-250 as primary telephoto. That's my opinion [H]
brendan
That's what I was thinking. Granted, the 55-250 isn't the best for image quality but it's the most logical choice for this year's show ...but next year, well we'll see! [:P]Quote:
Originally Posted by bburns223