Need your opinion on a watermark/logo

Hi Everyone,


I am not a graphic designer and don't really have much experience with web design. However, I'm trying to update my watermark, and also use it as a header for a website I'm creating. I'm going for a simplistic look. I don't know if I am violating any major design laws with my creations so far. Please feel free to let me know which one you like better.

Hey Alex,


I personally like number 2 better. However I think both will do great, but for different photos. If you're more of a classical/natural photo kind of person, I'd say go with number 1. If you're more into new style(photoshop, artsy work, out of the box work), I'd say go with 2.


Jan

Alex,


I don

Thanks Jan and Dave for your responses! I

I voted for "B"


I just think that two machine-generated- likekinds offontwill look more compatible and optically pleasing than a handwritten-like one and a machine-like one.


My 2 pennies...

I would almost agree with piiooo, but I honestly don

I like #1. I like a script font myself. I use one on my website: www.markclemphotography.com

thanks everyone for your suggestions and comments so far. I liked the script font with the regular font so I ended up with a combo. And as much as I liked the camera icon, I decided to leave it out and went with this instead.


[img]/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer-Discussions-Components-Files/24/4604.Alex-Sommers-Photography-logo-and-watermark-Final-for-website.jpg[/img]

I like this much better than either of the original two! I

I agree...option C is by far the best one. good choice on that

i would use all 3, depending what your putting it on, wedding images, A if every day stuff like senior ports, i use B, C is a good over all choice i think.