Printable View
I'm looking for a tripod that's robust enough to support my 550D w/ battery grip with a 400mm F/5.6 lens. Can someone recommend a good one for me that's around $150 but sturdy enough to be used on the field, and light enough to carry for hours?
Many thanks!
Franco
I've done some research on my own, but not sure which one to pick :S
The following tripods seem pretty good for the price..
http://www.ebay.ca/itm/New-Camera-Pr...t_12448wt_1163
http://www.ebay.ca/itm/Pro-Carbon-Fi...ht_2643wt_1163
Your fine using a ballhead with the 400 5.6. ( I own one with the much heavier 7d and battery grip) not really in a position to check your links. Most have a weight rating for the head and sticks separately.
Franco, Welcome to TDP.
When considering tripods for any purpose please keep in mind that a tripod can be as important as a good glass or a good camera to get that tack sharp image so often desired.. especially when shooting birds. Ultimately you pay for what you get. If you can afford to spend a little more I think you would be much happier in the long run. The difference between a $150 and a $250 or $300 tripod is considerable and well worth saving to by the better version. With that said, let's talk tripods:
1st--You didn't mention whether or not your price range included a head (which you will need)---my recommendations are based on the assumption that you also need to purchase a head.
2nd, I am not familiar with either of the tripods you mention, But I am highly skeptical of a $179 CF tripod/head and case combo for that price---The aluminum tripod at this price makes more sense to me---but certainly not what I would recommend, only because I am not familiar with it.
3rd, Just because a tripod/head combo says it can hold 6lbs and your rig is 6 pounds doesn't mean it will hold your camera/lens steady---look for something that can hold at least twice the weight of your camera/lens combo
Given your price range, I can only recommend a good aluminum tripod such as Manfrotto/Bogan. Granted they are a little heavier that CF sticks but you can usually get them around the 4 or 5 pound mark which is easily carried.
This tripod is well respected by many on this forum and seems to fall in your price range (without the head). I have personaly never used it but I have used other manfrotto tripods and found them to be very high quality and reliable.
A good ballhead is also important, but to keep your price range down, I would suggest this ball head which does add a little to your price range, but I think you would be very happy with this combo in the long run.
Hopefully, some others will respond and offer thier insight.
Good luck and let us know what you end up getting
Yes, I meant tripod with head with price around $150. I've looked into Manfrotto's tripods..they are good, but they are just a bit too expensive for me. I wonder if anyone here have tried the hahnel tripods..or even heard of the brand..cuz the tripod seems pretty decent for my need. supports 5Kg, 150+cm max height...
I've certainly heard of Hahnel, but not sure in what capacity (I don't own any, must have seen it in a shop somewhere).
But they're certainly not some new start-up, fly-by-night, or cheap chinese crap, take that how you will.
Not sure if this link will work, but there's a search for decent brands in a nice pricerange. I was considering the Manfrotto MK293/4 series at one point, For me they're just a little too short, a little too heavy, and carry not quite enough, but they're nice for the price (instead i'm getting a $300 Carbon Fibre tripod and $200 ballhead, that's the price you pay for 'a little bit better'...)
Here's a little more help. The 190xdb by Manfrotto is pretty similar to the pro, but with INconvenient wingnuts instead of quick release leg-locks. Here it is:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...egs_Black.html
Right now you can get this tripod with a rebate for $81.77. Add the ball head Bob suggested above and you are under $150. There you go. You could almost upgrade to the bigger 055 series tripod and stay near $150, but you said you wanted portable, and the 190 series is a little more portable; however, not as sturdy as the 055 series. Here's the link:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...egs_Black.html
Word of caution...you are going to notice the poor quality of the ball head before that of the tripod legs. Read this blog for fun (I followed, and I am still trying to find may way out of, the less efficient direction to purchase a nice tripod and head):
http://bythom.com/support.htm
p.s. I wouldn't buy any of that stuff from the ebay links. The things is...even though the links I provided above don't lead to top-of-the-line tripods, or even the top of the Manfrotto line, they lead to a trusted name-brand product. A brand that will back their product and can be purchased from a reliable dealer like B&H for a very competitive price.
Any chance I could get you to go in the direction of a monopod? Opens the door to better weight and leg locks. You'll hate using a cheap tripod/head. Just speaking from experience. If you have craigslist/want-ads, I'd check there and buy used as an option too. Some other big stores offer used equipment as well.
What's wrong with the 496RC2 ball head?? Because now that i think of it, it's true that I should invest on a better tripod..so I'm now thinking about a 055xprob with 496RC2 ball head..so that i dont need to worry about replacing it for the next decade or so, even though it kinda go over my budget..
I have a monopod for BIF shots, but with the 400 F/5.6, i'll need a steady tripod to take some still shots..because of its lack of IS
Sounds like a great combo. I've used a 488rc2 and was pleased with the performance. The 498 might be a better choice than the 496 - higher load capacity, separate pan lock, and likely a better match for the 400/5.6.Quote:
Originally Posted by francongphotography
Crap..now I want the 498RC2 with the 055xprob..looks like a lot of savings to do in the coming new year..Gotta save up for the best** i guess.
Thanks for all your help/suggestions!
How much safety factor do you usually recommend versus manufacturers specifications for how much weight a tripod or monopod can handle? 2X? 3X?
Thanks
Dave
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Throgmartin
You know it is not just safety, it is stability as well. At 2x with a telephoto lens on my Gitzo 2550XQR that is rated at 11 pounds I still get a bit of creep when setting it. If you tap the lens you might get some vibration, of course I use it at odd angles for macro and it is not a ballhead.
I have a cheaper tripod and head that is rated about 2x and it performs about the same. When I am using it with a shutter release for macro, I even whatch how I hold the cord of the release. I have found that even the movement of the cord can cause vibration and you get some blurr.
The higher rating you get the less problem you should have with vibration and movement. You said you wanted something light to hike with, so it may be a compromise for you. Going 3X or more is adding weight usually. If I had to carry something for hours on end I would tend to go for a smaller tripod and just be aware of its frailty.
Personally I wouldn't go less than 2x the weight I intend to hold. At 2x I would be aware of any vibration and movement I am getting so I can compensate.
I just picked up the 055XPROB and 498RC2 head. The set is very nice and I doubt you'll be disappointed. The guy at the link did a really nice writeup:
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...d.php?t=529785
Dave
Quote:
Originally Posted by francongphotography
Yup, definitely gonna pick that combination up. But I gotta save up first, for some time :P
Franco
error
Have you considered entry-level birds, such as chickens or parakeets?Quote:
Originally Posted by francongphotography