16-35mm f/4L IS vs. TS-E 17mm f/4L
Yes, I know this is like asking if one prefers apples or scallops. :rolleyes:
As I stated in the UWA lens thread, looking over my library less than 15% of my 16-35/2.8 shots are wider than f/4, and many of those are of static subjects where 3-4 stops of IS would be of more benefit than the extra stop of light. Accordingly, I just sold my 16-35mm f/2.8L II, and I had planned on ordering the 16-35mm f/4L IS to replace it. But I got to thinking... Most of my shots with the 16-35/2.8 are of buildings or landscapes and are from a tripod; only a few shots have people in them, and those were generally opportunistic photos where the 16-35 was already on the camera, but 24mm would have been wide enough.
Granted, the TS-E 17mm is significantly more expensive, but ignoring that, I find myself thinking the TS-E 17mm would be a better choice for me. Anyone want to talk me out of it?
16-35mm f/4L IS vs. TS-E 17mm f/4L
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ahab1372
Using filters is more difficult (and slower to set up?)
Great point, and the filter issue was a big negative in the past since there was really no way to put one on the TS-E 17, and I frequently use a 10-stop ND on my TS-E 24 as a 'people eraser'. But now there's the Wonderpana system, which mounts directly to the bayonet for the TS-E 17's lens cap. At $500 for the mount and 145mm 10-stop ND, it's not cheap...but it's at least possible, and seems not too difficult.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ahab1372
16-35 is better for walk around and opportunistic shots while the lens is already on the camera (even if that is only 15% of your shots - that's still some shots)
To clarify, 15% of my shots with the 16-35/2.8 were at apertures wider than f/4. Actually only a small percent of my overall shooting (maybe ~2%) has been with the 16-35/2.8. Definitely a niche lens for me, but sometimes you really need a UWA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ahab1372
You already have a TS-E - would the 17mm open up that many more opportunities?
Perhaps. The 24mm lens is wonderful, but I find it's often not wide enough for urban architecture, where there's often no room to back up.
Thanks!