:) That would explain why he was a solo act.
Printable View
Just to double check what's covered here. Does the image have to have been processed for this effect? I mean I have some high ISO, noisy, images with flare and low contrast that certainly look Lo-Fi, would they be the right sorta thing?
Correct. This assignment covers a wide arrange of photos. With and without post-processing. If you think yours fits, just upload it. If you have doubts about an entry, you can always ask Dr Croubie if your photo fits the description.
Here is one example of a new photo that I edited to look older(and fits the description). I'm pretty sure he isn't, but he did remind me a little to John Cleese.
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7235/7...bf4a60d2_z.jpg
Old School Racer by Jan Paalman, on Flickr
Here is my entry:
Attachment 1386
And I couldn't resist this one posing:
Attachment 1385
Edit:
The landing
Attachment 1387
I hope this meets the intent of the assignment. This is actually a 35 year old color film shot that I scanned and processed. This is actually the shot that got me interested in photography.
Reading on the beach:
http://rwilliamsimaging.com/img/s4/v...13511352-4.jpg
Bob, that one says "Print me!"
Wow, a lot of good entries so far (a lot are better than I can manage, I suppose I need more PP practise, normally I let the film decide how the colous are going to look).
And Ham, they can look however you want i suppose, it's a very open-ended topic. The main thing is that there's not too much pixel-peeping detail, just keep it to a 'simple' subject or scene, as it were. (the easy way is, if it looks good at 1200px wide/long, it shouldn't look any 'better' by zooming in)
My entry of a reflecting shot of my wife and I. Please note the incredible detail in this shot
Attachment 1389