Post your Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Lens shots

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BogdanD

[url="http://www.flickr.com/photos/48939759@N07/4907065533/]http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4100/...2141c6cb_z.jpg[/url]


1/200s at f/1.8, ISO 11, Canon Xsi





Here's mine, from when I was still using manual focus with this lens (what a stupid idea!)
Pure luck that I got his eyes in focus.....
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>

---

Pretty amazing at f1.8. Reviews indicate that the lens is not that sharp. ISO 11?

<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:PunctuationKerning />
<w:ValidateAgainstSchemas />
<w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
<w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
<w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables />
<w:SnapToGridInCell />
<w:WrapTextWithPunct />
<w:UseAsianBreakRules />
<w:DontGrowAutofit />
</w:Compatibility>
<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"]
</w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<mce:style><!
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
-->


<p class="MsoNormal"]Was going to throw this one out due to the exposure, but
while trying to minimize the preset menu in Lightroom, accidentally clicked the
&ldquo;Black and White &ndash;Creamtone&rdquo; filter......



[img]/resized-image.ashx/__size/600x0/__key/CommunityServer-Discussions-Components-Files/14/2112._5F00_MG_5F00_0012_2D00_2_5F00_001.jpg[/img]


....And decided to keep it. Shot it between a chain link fence


1/640sec at f/22
EF50mm f/1.8II
Canon 50D

Thanks everyone! It

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BogdanD

1/200s at f/1.8, <span style="font-size: xx-large;"]ISO 11, Canon Xsi





Here's mine, from when I was still using manual focus with this lens (what a stupid idea!)
Pure luck that I got his eyes in focus.....
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>

---

At what ISO did you shoot?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by clemmb

At what ISO did you shoot?

---

He used ISO 100. The picture is a Flickr link. On Flickr you can click on camera part on the information on the right where it says "This photo was taken onAugust 7, 2010using aCanon EOS Digital Rebel XSi."and you'll get the full EXIF. Or click "Actions" then "View EXIF data".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DavidEccleston

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by clemmb

At what ISO did you shoot?

---

He used ISO 100. The picture is a Flickr link. On Flickr you can click on camera part on the information on the right where it says "This photo was taken on[url="http://www.flickr.com/photos/48939759@N07/archives/date-taken/2010/08/07/]August 7, 2010[/url]using a[url="http://www.flickr.com/photos/48939759@N07/4907065533/meta/]Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi[/url]."and you'll get the full EXIF. Or click "Actions" then "View EXIF data".
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>

---

Thanks. I am not familiar with Flicker. I clicked on the photo and went there. From my Firefox i can often right click and get the EXIF. When this does not work I assume the user stripped it.


Mark

Sorry! I didn

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BogdanD

Sorry! I didn't realize I did that!
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>

---

It happens. I have fat fingers too


Mark

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by clemmb

Thanks. I am not familiar with Flicker

---

That why I pointed it out. Not everyone is going to realize the info is there. Flickr used to have a button called "Show more information" to get to the EXIF data. It was hidden near the bottom of the right hand size, in a small point size. In their recent redesign, it's moved to a very unclear spot. I mean, why would text indicating a camera model be a link to full EXIF? Maybe after the camera model it could say DETAILS, or EXIF, or MORE, but it doesn't. I don't find any of Yahoo!'s properties have nice interfaces.

<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="content-type" />
Great shot, BogdanD. The expression is priceless.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by clemmb

Pretty amazing at f1.8. Reviews indicate that the lens is not that sharp.

---

This is a 0.7 MP image corresponding to a 3 inch print -- wallet size -- so I don't think it really says anything about lens sharpness except "this lens is sharp enough to post images on the web or make wallet-size prints."I don't mean to pick on you clemmb, but I also don't want any other readers to get the wrong idea about this lens.



<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="content-type" />