here is 1 i took the other night .....rod
<div style="text-align: center;"][img]/resized-image.ashx/__size/600x450/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.46.19/Picture-005_2D00_1-_2800_Large_2900_.jpg[/img]</div>
Printable View
here is 1 i took the other night .....rod
<div style="text-align: center;"][img]/resized-image.ashx/__size/600x450/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.46.19/Picture-005_2D00_1-_2800_Large_2900_.jpg[/img]</div>
A social heron I recently came across.
100-400 @ near 400, no crop.
[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.39.91/Heron-Closeup.jpg[/img]
I've found that the 2x TC does do more "damage" to the image than is inherent in the lens being multiplied, but I've also found that (to my eye) it's worse for far-off objects than close ones; e.g. it is better for increasing magnification of close things than for increasing reach. Its negative impact can be lessened (and sometimes removed) at diffraction-inducing apertures, at which point you're fighting other sharpness loss than the lens system anyway. And at least the contrast and saturation loss from it are easily remediable on the computer.
Hey all... been working on applying to residency. Not had much time to shoot. From a trip to the waterfowl park last week.
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4116/...df8c6780_b.jpg
Canon 50D+70-200 f4 L @ 200mm f4.5 1/1000 ISO-100
Cheerios,
Dave.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJphoto
JJ,
Both, Version II and Version III extenders will reduce AF Drive Speed in order to improve AF Performance. The 1.4X extenders reduce AF Drive Speed by 50% and the 2X extenders reduce AF Drive Speed by 75%. That's a pretty big hit for the 2x. I had no idea that it was that much myself.
Source (towards the bottom of the page): http://www.usa.canon.com/dlc/controller?act=GetArticleAct&articleID=3508
Here is a comparison of Image Sharpness: 300mm f/2.8L IS with 2X converter @600mm f/5.6 vs. 600mm f/4L IS @ f/5.6
http://www.The-Digital-Picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=249&Camera=453&Sample=0&am p;FLI=2&API=2&LensComp=336&CameraComp= 453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=2
Rich
Quote:
Originally Posted by czeano
thank you czeano for pointing that out, never think about that before.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Lane
thanks Rich for the information. 75% sounds really bad, but Canon claims that the performance of the TC III in real world won't be that bad if using with their version II lenses and 1D or 1Ds body, so we will see soon.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJphoto
I think Canon is not being very clear on this. It seems their saying, that AF Tracking and AF Precision will be better with the New Super-Telephoto Lenses and New Version III Extenders, therefore AF Performance will be better, however it still sounds like the AF Drive Speed will be just as slow as it was before with the Version II Extenders. It sounds like the increased performance, is accomplished at the expense of speed. But, maybe your interpretation is better. Anyone else have a different interpretation?
Here is the link (bottom of page) : http://www.usa.canon.com/dlc/controller?act=GetArticleAct&articleID=3508
Rich
Tricolred Heron
EOS 1D MKIII + 500mm f/4 + 1.4 TC , hand held, from my recent excursion to Florida
[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.32.28/343V0197.jpg[/img]
California Least Tern
40D and 400 f/5.6L, f/7.1, 1/1250, 250, manual exposure and handheldhttp://www.pscvn.org/members/308/9-7...9-52-24_AM.jpg
Thanks for viewing and commenting
Nate,
hi nate,
nice pict i see you have a lot of very good bird picts ......... rod