-
I think I fixed the other photo, used my smartphone. Guess it didn't work out.
Yes, nice owl picture. I have but one VERY crummy shot of a barn owl in flight but would be ashamed to post it! They are certainly elusive.
Looks good to me Joel. That 5Ds R tempts me very much as well.
I like how the waves have a little HDR affect in them.
http://community.the-digital-picture...1&d=1428163313
John.
-
-
1 Attachment(s)
Nice shot of the Herons, it might be my monitor but they seem a little underexposed? The snow looks more like 30% grey, to me.
Took this just yesterday, not my best but still OK.
http://community.the-digital-picture...2&d=1428276258
There was crazy amounts of atmospheric distortion in this shot (2X on 600mm) and ISO 6400, it's so soft at 100% it's impossible to tell if it's in perfect focus or not (I suspect that it is.). But it's reasonable at 800 pix.
Hope you like it,
John.
-
Good call on the exposure John . I am away from home for a few days so im using my laptop and the brightness changes a lot depending on the angle im looking at the screen.
Is thi a little better , or to bright ?
https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7611/...652e5e12_h.jpgedited by sedwards679, on Flickr
-
Osprey....normally these guys don't come close enough to fill the frame....I did very little cropping on this shot.
https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7682/...d3274a57_c.jpg
-
Bill, it's a nice shot... but I'm confused. To me, those noise levels at ISO 800 imply a near pixel-peeping level of cropping, but you say you didn't crop much. Was it originally severely underexposed? Did you add grain in post?
-
thanks David...yes, it was underexposed and needed quite a bit of added exposure. I was shooting another subject when s/he appeared quickly....I turned focused and shot....this was the only shot w/it looking down at me w/eyes sharp after PPing.
-
-
Yes sedwards, it's MUCH better now!
The sea gull shot is great.
John.
-