Quote:
Originally Posted by Tadas N.
Thanks Tadas. The swallow image is great....love the low angle.
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tadas N.
Thanks Tadas. The swallow image is great....love the low angle.
Quote:
Originally Posted by w349
Thanks for the kind words...this is an Osprey, shutter speed was 1/1600
1D MK IV: 300mm f/2.8L IS + 1.4X @420mm, f/7.1 1/3200sec. ISO 400 CPL
I shot these while shooting surfing that's why the settings are the way they are!
American Oystercatcher:
Digging for Dinner!
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6141/...259b0024_b.jpg
Look what I found!
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6061/...2dbc3b5e_b.jpg
Ok, lets go wash the sand off!
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6061/...1cc62d1c_b.jpg
Who you looking at?
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6068/...6ac58454_b.jpg
C&C Welcome!
Rich
Thank you all for the comments!
The shots of an American Oystercatcher are really interesting, Richard, and they tell a story. I just would like them even more if they would have been taken from a low angle--the background would have been better.
Tadas,
I absolutely agree that a lower angle would have been much better. Your shot of the Swallow is a beautiful example of that.
I plead quilty on this one, because I had my monopod on and a waistbelt and I was afraid to get sand in everything. I think I may have a lower one from another (non-surfing day) to post, and then hopefully you can let me know what you think.
Thanks for the C&C. I also enjoyed looking through your website. Very nice work!
Rich
I would love to own a 500mm or 600mm so I was experimenting with the 2X extender to simulate 600mm. Of course the 2X extender slows down the AF and softens up the images a bit, but I'm trying to see how I like the 600mm range. It seems like I could really use the extra reach. The last photo is with the 1.4X extender.
1D-MKIV 300mm f/2.8L IS + 2X @600mm f/7.1 1/500sec- 1/1250sec, ISO 400 CPL
I definitely needed a faster SS on the 1st one. I let it drop to 1/500sec. by accident.
The American Oystercatcher's are very fast and they fly very erratically. I had a hard time tracking them with the 600mm angle of view, but I do like the reach.
They make very tight turns and then they dive down towards the water.
They were definitely going over the 5 MPH speed limit.
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6090/...308935c8_b.jpg
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6191/...59b992cc_b.jpg
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6193/...64620b3e_b.jpg
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6186/...ca1662f5_b.jpg
C&C Welcome!
Thanks for viewing,
Rich
Image Stabilization really pays for itself at 600mm, I bet! I like how close his wing is to the water in the last shot.
Here's one from a trip to the local wetlands.
[img]/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer-Discussions-Components-Files/15/6557.Duck-flap.jpg[/img]
And another. Lots of black and white from that day, I find the August greeny-yellow foliagecolours pretty unattractive.
[img]/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer-Discussions-Components-Files/15/3414.Swan-neck.jpg[/img]
Richard,
I agree with you about the 600mm.....I am holding out (ie saving up) for the new version which is about the same size and weight of the current 500mm. I think with version 3 teleconverters it might make the 800mm obsolete.
Joel
[img]/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer-Discussions-Components-Files/15/5226.343V2207.jpg[/img]
Another Osprey from South Carolina in May