Good point about istock. I do get frustrated at some of the rejects I get there and then I see some of the accepted images that have little composition and are hardly stock. Anyway, I am in limbo as...
Type: Posts; User: donj
Good point about istock. I do get frustrated at some of the rejects I get there and then I see some of the accepted images that have little composition and are hardly stock. Anyway, I am in limbo as...
You are very welcome. You certainly have the right equipment for a wedding shoot. It's just all the other stuff that gets tricky. When it's over and you've done well, it feels great. Here is a link...
Hi John,
I owned this same setup in 2007. The Sigma 150 is a sharp lens and it's build quality is excellent. It will do those things you listed very wellindeed. The only problem I had was some...
Opps, I sort of didn't answer your engagement question. Basically, your camera lenses will be tack sharp even at f/1.6 w/ 50 if focused correctly. Not every shot needs to be the same but generally w/...
Hi Tommyqh,
Interesting question but one I feel has no correct answer. I shot one wedding in August and I do stock photography as well as some portraiture. The wedding day I used mainly four...
I haveowned this lens for about 6 months now. It's a sharp lens, even at f/2.8. I see in comparisons w/ the Canon 70-200 f/2.8 the Sigma looks sharper at f/2.8 thoughout the zoom range. See...