Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Filter or no filter for 85 1.2?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Filter or no filter for 85 1.2?



    So some one you know I have recently purchased the Canon 85 1.2 L, my question is should I use a filter to protect the front element or not. And if so what is the best quality filter I can purchase for this lens, or for the matter of fact my other lenses as well.


    Thanks


    Joel

  2. #2
    Senior Member Maleko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    226

    Re: Filter or no filter for 85 1.2?



    Yes, and best one to get really is a nice quality UV filter.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Mark Elberson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Medford, NJ
    Posts
    1,045

    Re: Filter or no filter for 85 1.2?



    Quote Originally Posted by Joel Bookhammer


    should I use a filter to protect the front element or not. And if so what is the best quality filter I can purchase for this lens, or for the matter of fact my other lenses as well.
    <div style="CLEAR: both"]</div>

    B+W 72mm MRC UV Filter

  4. #4

    Re: Filter or no filter for 85 1.2?



    Thanks Mark I forgot Bryan had reviewed acouple.


    Thanks


    Joel

  5. #5

    Re: Filter or no filter for 85 1.2?



    I agree with Mark. The B+Ws are awesome.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    131

    Re: Filter or no filter for 85 1.2?



    With a lens that expensive with a front piece of glass that big I'd get at minimum a plain glass filter just to protect it.

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3

    Re: Filter or no filter for 85 1.2?






    Sweet lens! I love mine!


    I'm actually of the opposite opinion regarding UV filters. B+W filters are very very nice to be sure, but they're actually only slightly cheaper than most front elements. It cost $150 to replace the front element on a 28-300L, which is actually a more expensive lens. Now, I don't actually know what it costs to replace the front element on an 85L so I could be off-base. The other things to consider about filters is that they're pretty tough to get off lenses in some cases of damage (I know this from experience!). Also, scratches and dings to the front element rarely affect image quality. As for resale value, just go ahead and send it to Canon for element replacement if you want a better sale.


    Just my opinion, though!

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Melbourne, FL
    Posts
    1,246

    Re: Filter or no filter for 85 1.2?



    Quote Originally Posted by G Thomas





    Sweet lens! I love mine!


    I'm actually of the opposite opinion regarding UV filters. B+W filters are very very nice to be sure, but they're actually only slightly cheaper than most front elements. It cost $150 to replace the front element on a 28-300L, which is actually a more expensive lens. Now, I don't actually know what it costs to replace the front element on an 85L so I could be off-base. The other things to consider about filters is that they're pretty tough to get off lenses in some cases of damage (I know this from experience!). Also, scratches and dings to the front element rarely affect image quality. As for resale value, just go ahead and send it to Canon for element replacement if you want a better sale.


    Just my opinion, though!



    I'm on board with this. I believe UV filters are for beach days just to keep the elements out. I'm a hood guy. I think they offer the most protection with out image compromise. So if I had the 85 1.2 it wouldn't have a UV unless I was at the beach on windy day.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    745

    Re: Filter or no filter for 85 1.2?



    Daniel:


    2255 / 6 = 375.8 - that's what you will be paying for a damaged *front element*. If you ask me, other damages can occur thanks to dust, dirt and moisture, but let's assume that the only possible damage is a broken front element, that would cost you $375.


    40*4 = 160 - that's what you will be paying for 4 (assuming 4 lenses) UV filters.

  10. #10

    Re: Filter or no filter for 85 1.2?



    Well I have ordered one to be on the safe side.


    Thanks everyone


    Joel


    P.S. Anyone have any examples of filtered versus non filtered with the same shot?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •