Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: camera ISO vs. ISO

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    778

    camera ISO vs. ISO



    I think I remember that when I had a 40D, the ISO 200 was better and provided a little more cushion than the ISO 100. Do you folks know if the 7D is the same way?
    Words get in the way of what I meant to say.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Bill W's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Haverhill, MA
    Posts
    662

    Re: camera ISO vs. ISO



    After I upgraded from my 40D to the 7D I found this article interesting.


    Hope it helps; http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon_EOS_7D/noise_JPEG.shtml


    Regards


    Bill






  3. #3
    Senior Member Fast Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ferndale WA
    Posts
    1,187

    Re: camera ISO vs. ISO



    What do you mean by "cushion" at ISO 200? Mabye HLP mode? Apart from HLP mode ISO 100 has the most dynamic range and color tones for your old 40D and 7D.


    John

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    778

    Re: camera ISO vs. ISO



    Cushion as far as extra shutter speed or DoF difference with having twice as much light albeit artificial. The siginal to noise ratio on the 40d was better or just as good on iso set at 200 rather than 100. I was also thinking about the highlight tone thingy and didn
    Words get in the way of what I meant to say.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Fast Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ferndale WA
    Posts
    1,187

    Re: camera ISO vs. ISO



    I use HLP all the time, much better to have a little more noise (not much at 200) than blown highlights. If you want as little noise as possible, even if it

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •