Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: 70-200mm f/2.8 non-IS for car racing

  1. #1

    70-200mm f/2.8 non-IS for car racing



    I wrote a really nice post, lots of detail and humor, and when I clicked "Post" it gotten eaten up by the Server Unavailable error that hits these forums fairly frequently.


    So, here is the condensed version:


    I have the Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 non-IS lens and I'm going to the 10 hour Petit Le Mans in 2 weeks. I have since read that while this is a great lens for human fast action sports events, the IS version might actually be better for auto racing since I would want to use a panning move.


    I have a nice enough tripod, but the head is rather entry level, so, it's not the best for panning, though during the day I should be able to keep the camera pretty fast. I also have a monopod.


    Any tips for shooting car races with this set-up?


    Camera is a Canon T2i.

  2. #2

    Re: 70-200mm f/2.8 non-IS for car racing



    I also have the Canon 17-55mm kit lens with IS, so I would have an IS option available and with 18MP available, I'm sure I could do some cropping magic in Photoshop, but obviously, I want to put my 70-200mm to work.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    116

    Re: 70-200mm f/2.8 non-IS for car racing



    Quote Originally Posted by count_schemula


    I also have the Canon 17-55mm kit lens with IS, so I would have an IS option available and with 18MP available, I'm sure I could do some cropping magic in Photoshop, but obviously, I want to put my 70-200mm to work.
    <div style="CLEAR: both"]</div>




    Do you mean 18-55?

  4. #4
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,853

    Re: 70-200mm f/2.8 non-IS for car racing



    Quote Originally Posted by MattG
    Do you mean 18-55?

    17-55, 18-55, what's the difference? Only 1 millimeter, right? Well, ok, 1 millimeter and a thousand dollars.


    But in this case, it actually does make a difference - the cheap EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS kit lens has an IS system with automatic panning detection (an automatic mode 2 IS), whereas the excellent EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM, despite it's substantially better optical and build quality(and &gt;$1K price tag), does not feature a panning mode in its IS system.

  5. #5
    Administrator Sean Setters's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    3,361

    Re: 70-200mm f/2.8 non-IS for car racing



    I would suggest doing some test panning with the monopod to see if you can get clear shots using the 70-200 f/2.8 L under similar conditions. You might try shooting birds or even traffic. If the shots pass muster, then I think you're good to go with what you have.

  6. #6

    Re: 70-200mm f/2.8 non-IS for car racing



    Yes, lol, I did mean the cheapy EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS kit lens.


    What is this automatic panning detection? Is it something I have to set up, or is it just how IS works on this lens?


    More or less what is it doing?


    Yeah, I think I will have to shoot traffic and see what results I get.


    So, basically, I'm just looking to kind of pan the camera with the car?

  7. #7

    Re: 70-200mm f/2.8 non-IS for car racing



    Let me first say that I'm jealous that you will be atPetit Le Mans while I'm stuck watching it on TV. On topic I've used my 70-200 f/4 non is at the Rolex 24 &amp; homestead and I've been able to get some pretty decent panning shots though my keeper rate tends to be a little on the low side. I shot them all handheld since there are fences all around Daytona, I just went up in the stands and braced myself against the railing, started at a pretty fast shutter and kept clicking it down till I got to the point where they were blurry. Very trail and error but worth the effort in my opinion.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    1,450

    Re: 70-200mm f/2.8 non-IS for car racing



    Quote Originally Posted by count_schemula
    What is this automatic panning detection? Is it something I have to set up, or is it just how IS works on this lens?

    The latter. It's automatic on that lens.


    Some lenses have a basic IS system which attempts to counteract any movement. With the worst of these, they'll attempt to over-compensate for movement that isn't natural for hand-holding, such as when mounted on a tripod. For these lenses it's suggested to disable IS when using a tripod, as the over-compensation can introduce blurriness.


    The next grade of lenses with IS can detect that they're on a tripod and disable IS automatically. There is always the switch if you don't trust it, or if it's not working for you. When not on a tripod they attempt to counteract any movement just as the first kind does.


    The third grade of lenses have 3 way switch, with off, mode 1, and mode 2. Mode 1 is like the above. Mode 2 dampens motion vertically, but allows for horizontal motion for panning. Set the switch to the appropriate mode.


    The fourth grade is automatic mode 2. The lens determines you're moving in a panning motion or not, and automatically enables mode 2 when appropriate.


    The latest IS mode is Hybrid IS, or HIS, which Canon has put on their latest 100mm f/2.8 L macro lens. This attempt to compensate not just for floaty sideways movements, but rotation as well.


    On Flickr - Namethatnobodyelsetook on Flickr
    R8 | R7 | 7DII | 10-18mm STM | 24-70mm f/4L | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 | 50mm f/1.8 | 85mm f/1.8 | 70-300mm f/4-5.6L | RF 100-500mm f/4-5-7.1L

  9. #9
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,853

    Re: 70-200mm f/2.8 non-IS for car racing



    Quote Originally Posted by DavidEccleston


    The third grade of lenses have 3 way switch, with off, mode 1, and mode 2. Mode 1 is like the above. Mode 2 dampens motion vertically, but allows for horizontal motion for panning. Set the switch to the appropriate mode.


    Just to clarify, on lenses in your 'third grade' with an IS mode switch, when it's set to mode 2 it dampens motion in the direction orthogonal to the panning direction, regardless of what direction you are panning. So, it damps vertical shake if you're panning horizontally to follow a car or bird, damps horizontal shake if you're panning vertically to follow a rocket or a rising elevator on the exterior of a building, and also damps vertical shake if you are holding the camera in portrait orientation for framing reasons and panning horizontally (so the camera is 'vertical').


    Here's what Canon has to say about their IS systems.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,304

    Re: 70-200mm f/2.8 non-IS for car racing



    Quote Originally Posted by count_schemula
    Any tips for shooting car races with this set-up?

    You should be fine with either the tripod or monopod and your 70-200. Or even without if you have a steady motion.


    Tips: try panning a few times and see what settings work for you. Keep in mind that the cars at the track go a lot faster than the cars in the streets. It's very hard to get a nice panning effect while shooting street-movement. Anyway practice a lot. The slower the shutterspeed, the more panning-effect your picture gain, however the more tricky it gets [] Also the closer the background to your subject is, the greater the effect. And if you zoom in a bit, you can see the effect even more.


    Here's some examples with the idea. And some settings that worked out for me during the amateur cycling part of a triathlon. Note that the keeper-rate isn't too high with these kind of shots.





    5D mark 2 with 24-105@ manual settings: 105mm f10 ISO100 1/100th and IS turned off.





    Same camera and lens @ Manual settings: 105mm f8 ISO100 1/160th and IS turned off.


    I used manual mode for these shots, but TV works fine as well. Set the shutterspeed as you like it and let the camera sort out the aperture for you. Also note that I used fairly fast shutterspeeds, but since my background was against a forest it doesn't really matter. When you have obstacles like commercial signs etc in the background it's advisable to use a shutterspeed that wipes out the read-ability of these signs.


    Anyway good luck!


    Jan

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •