Quote Originally Posted by Chuck Lee
I'm sort of suprised that the new Macro wasn't f2.

That would have been nice.


Quote Originally Posted by Chuck Lee
Obviously, this lens has a larger front element than the classic 100 f2.8 (12 elements in 8 groups) and different optical build (15 elements in 12 groups)

Yup. And nine circular aperture blades! There are other differences, to be sure. But I *guess* only the IS will be inciting to me. We'll see, though. []


Quote Originally Posted by Chuck Lee
The price at $300 more is by far the most shocking feature...[img]/emoticons/emotion-3.gif[/img] My gosh it's actually affordable!!

Wow! I'm shocked by how much the price of the classic macro has gone up. I paid $400 or so new, IIRC.