Hi!


Here's a quick list of my photographic gear:


>Canon 40D w/ 18-55 IS kit lens


>Canon 50mm 1.8 II


>Canon 85mm 1.8


>Canon 24-70mm 2.8 L (UX date code)


>Canon 70-200mm 2.8 L non-IS


>Manfrotto tripod w/ 804RC2 head


>Leica DLux 4





Im planning to sell/rade in my 70-200mm 2.8L for something Im not really sure if Im thinking the right way. I want to have something like a 135 f2 L. But the thing is...135mm is already covered in the 70-200mm focal length. On the other hand, sharper images ( im not sure compared to 70-200), faster lens, llighter & not attracting a lot of attention compared to the "big white". With the 70-200mm, better reach w/ the 200mm at the end, versatile subject framing, weather-sealed.


Im really confused right now!


Here's what I'm wishing for:


>fisheye lens ( canon or third party)


>60mm macro since Im on 1.6 body


>UWA 14mm L/15mm prime, 17-40 f4 L, tokina 11-16/tokina 10-??mm


>135 f2 L (as mentioned above)


>Flash (580ex II or Metz 58 AF-1)


>70-200mm 2.8 L IS II





Im more into general field, hence Im using my DLUx 4 for wide angle purposes & sometimes still macros (generates quite nice photos after PP). Its doing better than my kit lens actually! Using 50mm & 24-70mm as walkaround lens & 85mm 1.8 / 70 -200mm 2.8 for landscape & action photography.





Any suggestions? I hope im not doing a decision which I will really regret in the end.





Thanks in advance guys1