-
quick astrophotos (or: making do with a lens that was cheap in 2002)
I've long been interested in astronomy (looking through telescopes, that is) and photography, but always resisted astrophotography. Too time-consuming, too expensive, and I knew I could never get results that compare with what serious guys get.
But with the 5D II and live view to make focusing easy, I coudln't resist attaching the thing to my little telescope to see what I got.
The sensor is so sensitive, I can see dim stars with live view. A 10 second exposure at iso 12800 is enough to see if the object is where I want it in the field. The results, while falling far short of what "real astrophotographers" get, were better than I expected.
http://picasaweb.google.com/jonruyle/Astro#
Or:
[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.25.93/orion-nebula.jpg[/img]
Orion Nebula 4 min 800mm f/8 ISO 800
[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.25.93/m51.jpg[/img]
M51 2min 800mm f/8 ISO 1600
[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.25.93/comet-lulin.JPG[/img]
Comet Lulin 1 min 800mm f/8 ISO 1600
The real surprise, though, was not the results, but how much fun it was. I was up three nights in a row, and got up at 4am a couple of days ago to catch comet Lulin.
Keep in mind that these are all short exposures. (In picassa, click "more info" on the right to see the stats ). I used no autoguiding or stacking. My inexpensive em-2 mount and fs102 refractor were both designed for visual use, not photography. I used no fancy image processing (no maximum entropy, no lucy-richardson), no frozen ccds. Worse yet, no skill . All I had going for me was the 5D II and a little takahashi refractor. I'll bet the serious guys get awesome results with this camera.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules