Either of these two bodies would be a significant upgrade for me.


I think I want a full frame but don't know if I should wait for the markIII and get a 7d until that day arrives. Are the AF issues of the mkII sigificant or of little consequence. I do not shoot a lot of action/sports. One reviewer felt that a well refined older system (AF) would be 'safer' than a new untested system. I tend to be risk averse. 'Too much information..' looking for guidance.


I want to upgrade soon as I have a trip planned in the near future. Is the learning curve for either of these cameras so steep that I should wait until after the trip? I've been attempting to ake photos for a long time, have had a canon dslr for several years, reasonable familiar with manipulating settings on present camera.


Help, Mr. Wizard!