Originally Posted by Kayaker72
Brant, One thing Dawned on me---Maybe we are mixing apples and oranges and expecting the same results:
On my test, I only timed 15 seconds andwas getting some significant buffer lag by the end of the test.
On your test, you did 20 seconds, so I can only assume you exprienced the same the last few seconds of the test.
Now your total calculationsmost likley included those "slow moments" when you are only getting one or two shots off per second
With your test being 20 seconds long you had 5 more seconds of "slow" to throw into your calculations, which would reduce the overall calculated speed.
My suggestion is for two or three of us to use the exact test parameters (or as close as possible) and then see what happens---My guess is they will probably be fairly close.
The other thing I noticed is that I reported an average "per file" size whereas you reported the sum of all the file sizes. If assumptions andreverse math is correct you were getting individual file sizes around 18MB per file and I was getting around 20 MB per filewhich tells me weprobably haddifferent camera setups.
If one of our science based forum members are willing to design a test we can all do, I would be more than willing to participate
Bob
Reply With Quote