-
Senior Member
My choices:
Last spring I got the 100mm f/2.8L macro, and use it way more than I thought I would... so that would probably be my first choice also.
If there were not money restrictions, then I would want to get a TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II. I would go with the TS-E 17mm f/4L, but I guess I always assumed there would be more distortion with it (I do not know this to be true, but just assumed so).
The 100mmL has gotten me doing a lot of macro, and it has also managed to get me wanting more magnification... so the other one I would like to try is the MP-E 65mm f/2.8 Macro.
But before any of these (again assuming no money issues) I would absolutley love to have the 500mm f/4L II, or the 600mm f/4L II. With three kids going to college... not likely.
Last edited by conropl; 12-05-2011 at 12:53 AM.
Reason: I was limiting my thinking to wider lens, but Kayaker made me remeber the super tel's are primes also:)
5DS R, 1D X, 7D, Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6
, 24mm f/1.4
L II, 16-35mm f/4
L IS, 24-105mm f/4
L, 50mm f/1.8
, 100mm Macro f/2.8
L, 70-200mm f/2.8
L IS II
, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6
L, 580EX-II
flickr
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Reply With Quote