Hi Community,


I am looking at buying one of the following lenses and want to make the right decision: The EF 70-200mm f/2,8 L USM or the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 l IS USM


They both have their pros, the 70-300 has the extra reach as well as image stabilisation and much smaller, where as the 70 -200 has a faster and constant f/2.8 but NO image stabiliser. My main concern is image quality… I'm looking for the sharpest lens. I have checked the ISO 12233 Charts of the 2 lenses and the 70 - 300 is sharper especially wide open. Am I a fool to turn down a f/2.8 lens, though? And is the 70-300mm L worth the investment and is it as good as they say?