Results 1 to 10 of 81

Thread: Canon EOS 5D Mark III | First Thoughts

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #30
    Senior Member Mark Elberson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Medford, NJ
    Posts
    1,045
    It was one month ago today that I started this thread. Since then I've used my Mark III for: (1) Newborn Portrait Session (2) Family Portrait Sessions (1) Wedding and countless images of my daughter :-)

    Observations:

    One-Shot Focus:

    The auto focus is phenomenal. Having points where I need them has been clutch to making images at wide apertures. It's also easy to switch between points without having to take your eye away from the viewfinder.

    Quote Originally Posted by shizam1 View Post
    At some points, it was taking 2-3 seconds to achieve focus on the 5DIII! So yeah, I missed some shots of the bride hugging guests. So I took up the 5DII, and was getting exactly the same result, or maybe (gasp) even faster.
    I noticed this too on a few occurrences. However, when using the Mark II I ALWAYS used the center focus point whereas on the Mark III I NEVER used the center focus point. Next time I will use one of the (5) dual cross-type points to see if that would make a difference. Also, I was using 430EX IIs on both bodies and it can only support up to 9 focus points. I am not sure which ones they would translate to on the Mark III but it's very likely that they were providing little to no help.

    AI Servo Focus:

    I ended up using this for most of the wedding reception. With low-light, fast glass and wide-open apertures I was thrilled with the results. On the Mark III I was using the 85mm L @ f/1.4 and the 135mm L @ f/2 with great results. Most of the time I was using AF point expansion.

    Spot AF:

    I rarely (if ever) use this which does surprise me. I have had such great success with both single-point and expansion that it has not come up. I could see using it though when you are dealing with a lot of textures and contrast that could easily confuse the AF system.

    Metering:

    I actually use Av more than M which for me is a revelation!

    High ISO:

    To my eye it handles high ISO (>= 800) better than the Mark II. I think anywhere from 1/2 to 1 stop of improvement is realistic.

    Disclaimer:

    I am not a reviewer, just an observer. I do shoot almost daily though and in a wide variety of situations. I would be happy to answer any direct questions about my experience using either the Mark II or the Mark III.
    Last edited by Mark Elberson; 04-30-2012 at 06:24 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •