-
Re: EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS vs. EF 70-200mm f/4L IS
When I first started assembling my kit, I wanted to be the all primes guy especially under 100mm. As I started to get paying jobs, while I didn't mind changing lenses, models lose patients, interior designers lose patience and so forth. I realized zooms were the way to go. For the most part L zooms are so sharp anyway, I don't think you lose a much.
I'll will admit though, sometimes as I look through images I've shot and look at the range used and the want to be artist in me goes "Man I shot that at 24mm (or 50mm), I should have used my prime."
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules