-
Super Moderator
The RF lenses are looking very nice. Bryan has now reviewed the RF 24-105 and the review for the RF 50 f/1.2 was posted today. Plus, a number of other reviewers have been posting their thoughts.
The review I am waiting for is the 28-70 f/2. Everyone is referring to it with superlatives, but I've yet to see a really thorough review.
I just scrolled through the 50 f/1.2. Looks great. One thing I like about TDP reviews is all the comparisons. While very impressed with the wide open IQ I have to say, that is a big lens. I mean, I consider my Sigma 50A to be big and the RF is bigger. I know many will prefer the native Canon glass, assume native AF is better, etc, but I have had very good luck with Sigma and really like a number of their lenses. I would trade my 50A for something optically equivalent but smaller/lighter. The Canon RF 50 f/1.2 is the former, but not that latter (plus...RF mount).
But, overall, it is nice to see Canon come out of the gate with some nice offerings in the RF lineup. As the need to differentiate becomes more important, great glass is one of the best ways to do it.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules