Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Three New Lenses

  1. #11
    Super Moderator Kayaker72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    New Hampshire, USA
    Posts
    5,672
    A few MTF comparisons, taken from canon japan.

    Name:  RF 24-105 comparison.jpg
Views: 45
Size:  147.7 KB



    Another interesting point: 24-105 f/2.8 - 11 aperture blades; EF 24-70 II and RF 24-70 - 9.

    The bokeh and rendering I am seeing from that lens is stellar. Some features are complete overkill for me, but....I use an EF 500 II to take photos of birds in my backyard...so, you know, par for the course.
    Last edited by Kayaker72; 11-04-2023 at 05:58 PM.

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Central Kentucky
    Posts
    3,619
    That looks really good to me!

  3. #13
    Super Moderator Kayaker72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    New Hampshire, USA
    Posts
    5,672
    On the long end...

    Name:  RF 200-800 comparison.jpg
Views: 35
Size:  149.1 KB


    So, I know Canon changed their MTF process a few years ago, given that these do not have f/8, as the old MTFs did and they were taken directly off Canon-Japan's website, I think they are current. But, I am surprised that the 100-400 II the blue line at 400 mm (30 lp/mm) is higher than the 100-500.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	spec-mtf RF 100-500.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	33.0 KB 
ID:	3044   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	mtf 100-400 II.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	35.3 KB 
ID:	3045  
    Last edited by Kayaker72; 11-04-2023 at 06:09 PM.

  4. #14
    Super Moderator Kayaker72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    New Hampshire, USA
    Posts
    5,672
    And finally...if anyone is discounting the RFs 10-18

    Name:  spec-mtf RFs 10-18.jpg
Views: 40
Size:  30.3 KB


    vs the EFm 11-22

    Name:  mtf EFm 11-22.jpg
Views: 42
Size:  34.0 KB


    Not a bad little lens, especially for the money. 7 aperture blades. That is one of my issues with the less expensive lenses, but you aren't buying that lens for pretty bokeh.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •