I guess you are tired!! Your rebutal was very impressive. There are some things of question but I agree with your points and thatMr. Rockwellis shall we say passionately opinionated. There is absolutely no constructive reason to go any further with this.


This is part of what I've been talking about. We have a tendency to get lost in this exercise as I did for 2 years.


You'll also notice that I prefixed my link to St. Rockwell with "here's an interesting point of view" There's always an opinion. I apologize to anyone who was mislead to believe that everything stated there is the gospel truth. Daniel's right. We need to be careful when sighting others opinions.


Garrett, I would simply point out what a complex mess all of this has become. The post that Daniel refered to concluded in the unfortunate news that the poster did not have a monitor good enough to view the red in the flowers of the photo he took. So what would Adobe RGB or even accuratesRGB do for him? The equipment as Danieleluded to,must be capable first.


If you like to work in Adobe RGB and find it useful to you that's great. Just remember that you will have to convert your web images before e-mailing and posting to the web. You will also need to convert to view/use with Windows Apps. If you share your images with family and friends those will also need to be converted. It is IMHO an exercise in futility.


Like Daniel and K. Rockwell I'll stick with sRGB. []