Originally Posted by canoli
In the case of film, that's correct: the headroom is built right into the recording medium. For example, a certain emulsion might have 6 stops above middle gray (headroom) and 6 stops below middle gray ("footroom") and that's it.
But with digital, it's a little different. You can put middle gray anywhere you want. So with 10 stops of dynamic range, you can have 3.5 stops above middle gray (headroom), and 6.5 below. Or 8 stops above and only 2 stops below. It's up to the raw converter. In practice, raw converters tend to put out 3.5 stops above, and 4.5 stops below, and stop there (8 stops).
Originally Posted by canoli
Precisely.
Originally Posted by canoli
Yes. Usually when you're on a tripod it's possible to "ETTR" so that the histogram is as far to the right as you want it. So there's no need to move on to the next step (ITTR).
Originally Posted by canoli
That's disappointing.
Originally Posted by canoli
Yes, I think it's great. It reduces hot pixels and pattern noise, but it increases random noise a little bit. I can't think of why it would trade off any detail. (Maybe he's thinking of Nikon's long exp NR, which does eradicate small details.)
Originally Posted by canoli
No, you did it right. Always do "ETTR then ITTR", never the reverse. Doing ITTR first would result in a lot more noise. Exposure is more important than ISO.




Reply With Quote