Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Canon 500L vs 600L

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    325

    Re: Canon 500L vs 600L



    Quote Originally Posted by Dallasphotog


    The EF300mm f/2.8 might be the best lens Canon makes.
    <div style="clear: both;"]</div>


    I'm of the opinion that the 200 f/2 is the best lens in the lineup but the 300 is right next to it.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    109

    Re: Canon 500L vs 600L



    Yeah I'd have to say that the 200 f/2's pretty high on my wishlist. Then again I don't shoot sports so I haven't given much thought to the 300.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,156

    Re: Canon 500L vs 600L



    Quote Originally Posted by crosbyharbison


    Quote Originally Posted by Dallasphotog


    The EF300mm f/2.8 might be the best lens Canon makes.
    <div style="clear: both;"]</div>


    I'm of the opinion that the 200 f/2 is the best lens in the lineup but the 300 is right next to it.
    <div style="clear: both;"]</div>


    I find the 200/2 a very hard-to-justify lens though, unfortunately. It's got amazing image quality, but it's only one stop faster than a zoom lens I have (as well as a prime for SIGNIFICANTLY less money). The 300/2.8 is more than a stop faster than the 100-400 (maybe two stops); the 400/2.8 is two whole stops faster, and the 500+ aren't covered in a (Canon) zoom. If I was doing more portrait work, the 200/2 would pop higher in the list, but it's tough to lay down that much cash given the margins on portrait work.
    We're a Canon/Profoto family: five cameras, sixteen lenses, fifteen Profoto lights, too many modifiers.

  4. #4

    Re: Canon 500L vs 600L



    I keep drooling over the 500 myself. Some people at another forum were advising that the 300 f2.8 would be a better option, but I don't think it'd be worth the cost for me.


    I have a 5DII and 70-200 f2.8 IS as well as a 2x Extender. As a lot of people warned me before I bought it, quality with the 2x Extender is poor - so poor that I'm almost better off just cropping from a 200mm shot. I've also often found that 400mm isn't enough for me, otherwise I'd save my bank balance / house deposit and get the 400 f5.6 prime.


    I do want a long telephoto though and I figure that the best option would be the 500 with a 1.4 TC. Then, if the 200 wasn't long enough but the 500 was too long, I could stick the 1.4 TC on the 70-200 and crop from there, assuming the combo is sharp enough - I reckon the difference in 100mm at these lengths is much less than the scope for cropping with 21MP.


    I'd just have to find a way of getting a 500 f4 from the States somehow - at US$5,800 you guys can get them a lot cheaper than our GBP &pound;5,000!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •