Originally Posted by peety3
It doesn't have to be. I used the word exposure to make such disclaimers unnecessary. If the subject is two stops brighter, and one adds a two stop ND, then exposure stays the same. Exposure relates to the total amount of light per area.
Originally Posted by peety3
No, what you can see plainly by reading the text is that they have the same f-number and shutter speed. If flash was used on one, or ND filter on the other, or different scene luminance on one, then exposure would be different. I specifically stated that exposure was the same, therefore all those other factors (flash, ND filters, scene luminance) are the same.
Originally Posted by peety3
No, I define exposure the same way as the dictionary and photography textbooks (e.g. "Photography", by London and Upton): total amount of light per area.
Originally Posted by peety3
It appears that we differ on the definition of "exposure".
Originally Posted by peety3
A change in the amount of light *is* a change in exposure.
Originally Posted by peety3
That's incorrect. They may have the same brightness, and the same raw data values, but they have very different exposures.




Reply With Quote