Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Considering a test of the MP-E 65mm 2.8 1-5x Macro

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    327

    Re: Considering a test of the MP-E 65mm 2.8 1-5x Macro



    I'm still very new to macro, but even in my limited experience I have discovered that at 1:1 handheld, it is challenging to control the placement of the DOF. The slightest movement back or forth changes where the focus will be, faster than the camera can AF (and AF speed is irrelevant with the MP-E anyway, since it's MF only). This is not too much of a problem at apertures smaller than, say, f/8, but when you get up to 3:1 or higher, the DOF is paper thin even when you are stopped down. I can't even imagine trying to shoot 5:1 handheld and expect to get the focus placement accurate.


    The reason why I point this out is because accurate focus in such a situation does not benefit from additional light--you can have all the light you want but if you cannot steady the camera to within fractions of a millimeter, you cannot expect to get accurate focus at 5:1.


    Now, that doesn't mean you *must* use a tripod and/or macro rail...some people do quite well by bracing or resting the camera on a surface. There are ways of making sure the camera doesn't move that don't require using a tripod. And not all tripods are big, clunky, heavy deals. Some are quite small and portable.



  2. #2
    Senior Member Maleko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    226

    Re: Considering a test of the MP-E 65mm 2.8 1-5x Macro



    Quote Originally Posted by wickerprints
    The reason why I point this out is because accurate focus in such a situation does not benefit from additional light--you can have all the light you want but if you cannot steady the camera to within fractions of a millimeter, you cannot expect to get accurate focus at 5:1.
    <div style="CLEAR: both"]</div>

    So true!

  3. #3
    Senior Member Maleko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    226

    Re: Considering a test of the MP-E 65mm 2.8 1-5x Macro



    Quote Originally Posted by wickerprints
    The reason why I point this out is because accurate focus in such a situation does not benefit from additional light--you can have all the light you want but if you cannot steady the camera to within fractions of a millimeter, you cannot expect to get accurate focus at 5:1.
    <div style="CLEAR: both"]</div>

    So true!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •