Originally Posted by Fouad
- birds, zoo, park: 300mm f/2.8
- flowers, landscape, portraits, etc.: 200mm f/2
Now all you need to do is decide which one is more important to you. (FWIW, you'll need at least 2X TC to do birding with the 300mm f/2.8.)
Originally Posted by Fouad
- birds, zoo, park: 300mm f/2.8
- flowers, landscape, portraits, etc.: 200mm f/2
Now all you need to do is decide which one is more important to you. (FWIW, you'll need at least 2X TC to do birding with the 300mm f/2.8.)
Originally Posted by Daniel Browning
the 300mm f/2.8 takes fantastic portrait shotsthe working distance is just a little long, and its gets heavy to handhold after a bit
I've got same question before 300 f2.8 or 200 f2? after all I bought 300mm f2.8, because I think 200mm really not long enough and I already own 70-200 f2.8 & f4 IS USM~