Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Canon 300/2.8L IS or 200/2L IS......?????

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, Washington, USA
    Posts
    1,956

    Re: Canon 300/2.8L IS or 200/2L IS......?????



    Quote Originally Posted by Fouad
    I will be using the lens for birds, flowers, landscape, non formal portraits, zoo, park, etc.
    • birds, zoo, park: 300mm f/2.8
    • flowers, landscape, portraits, etc.: 200mm f/2



    Now all you need to do is decide which one is more important to you. (FWIW, you'll need at least 2X TC to do birding with the 300mm f/2.8.)

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    225

    Re: Canon 300/2.8L IS or 200/2L IS......?????



    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Browning
    [/quote
    • flowers, landscape, portraits, etc.: 200mm f/2




    the 300mm f/2.8 takes fantastic portrait shots the working distance is just a little long, and its gets heavy to handhold after a bit

  3. #3

    Re: Canon 300/2.8L IS or 200/2L IS......?????



    I've got same question before 300 f2.8 or 200 f2? after all I bought 300mm f2.8, because I think 200mm really not long enough and I already own 70-200 f2.8 & f4 IS USM~

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •