Originally Posted by Daniel Browning
I checked the Nikon page and it says 9 fps for FX, 11 fps for DX, like the D3. I'm not sure what the difference is between the D3 & D3s, other than $200. I don't need to spend the time to find out, either. I ain't buyin' no Nikon, not with $7800 invested in Canon lenses (nearly all bought used), not counting the 5 I need to sell (paid $1800).
Don't get me wrong--9 fps is very good, especially for those of us used to 5 fps (30D) or even 6.3 fps (50D) or 6.5 fps (40D). I doubt that +/- 1 fps is a "killer" factor in a sports photographer's buying decision.
Reply With Quote