Remote Strobe Triggers -- Manual Remote?

[wickerprints]

Sorry, perhaps my post was a little chaotic...


Primary question: Why no multi-channel radio-remotes that allow per-channel remote manual settings of flash power.


Secondary question: Why not the above radio-receiver integrated into the strobe to cut costs and clutter.
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>

In doing my own research before settling on the PocketWizard FlexTT5s, here is what I discovered:

1. The multi-channel type of device you describe is not practical, because then the transmitter must simultaneously emit signals over multiple frequencies, thereby increasing expense, and this is not necessary since manual settings can be controlled in other ways.
2. Some strobes do integrate radio receivers. However, due to the fact that there are competing devices and RF methodologies in the market, no single communication standard exists. Thus the particular strobe you buy, if it has an integrated receiver, would only function for a particular type of RF triggering system. Stand-alone receivers may seem more expensive, but in fact, when you realize that many strobes are several times more expensive than the receivers, it becomes more cost-effective to keep them separate in order to maximize interoperability--that is, until a single standard is agreed upon (unlikely).
3. The cost difference between non-TTL systems and TTL systems is not really all that much, especially considering that many companies that offer both, offer them in a way such that they remain interoperable. For instance, both PocketWizard's ControlTL and RadioPopper PrX systems are compatible with their respective previous-generation systems.
4. The best solution would be to have the RF triggering system built directly by Canon into the body and their Speedlites, as well as sell stand-alone receivers for studio strobes, but they do not seem particularly interested in entering the RF trigger market.
5. When I first started looking, I didn't care for TTL functionality at all. To be sure, I still don't. I could have been happy with just a regular trigger. But the eBay/Cactus triggers looked cheap and unreliable (waste of money); the CyberSyncs looked good but were very, shall we say, bare bones--especially for the cost; and RadioPopper lost my business because they couldn't stock their product in a timely fashion, not to mention their PrX system is hugely expensive and does not provide added value over Canon's ETTL-II, as opposed to PocketWizard's ControlTL.
6. Hotshoes are a must. I honestly don't understand why PC sync is still used--it is a terrible cable design. Hotshoes, if designed properly, are secure, stable, and convenient. The only thing I can't understand is why PocketWizard went with "glass-reinforced resin" (read: hard plastic) for their hotshoe foot. It really could not cost that much to make one identical to the Canon feet. Oh, and while we're on the topic of hotshoes, I discovered something interesting about the PW hotshoe (on top). It is very close, but not identical, to the Canon hotshoe. It is not tapered down where the pin contacts are located. This means when you attach a Speedlite, it does not positively lock! The lever moves about 3/4ths the way across, but you can't push it all the way or else you could break the shoe.

Anyway, those are just my ramblings, not necessarily addressing everything in your post.

[Colin500]

Anyway, those are just my ramblings, not necessarily addressing everything in your post.

Perhaps not, but thanks for your insights!