Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: White Balance Question - Basic Goal?

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,156

    Re: White Balance Question - Basic Goal?



    Quote Originally Posted by canoli


    So as long as you shoot RAW then it's not so important to get the WB "right" (closer than Auto at least) at capture?
    <div style="clear: both;"]</div>


    One of the benefits of getting WB close to right up front is if you're using flash: getting the flash's white balance to match your ambient lighting. Fixing this in post is much tougher than just correction for auto or wrong WB with one/uniform ambient light source.
    We're a Canon/Profoto family: five cameras, sixteen lenses, fifteen Profoto lights, too many modifiers.

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    133

    Re: White Balance Question - Basic Goal?



    RaW


    AWB depends to adjust take a picture of a "WHITE PAPER" if the colour incorrect adjust the Kelvin and take a shot on people or scene or landscape if its too blueish adjust to a hiher number if its too brownish adjust to a lower number.

  3. #13

    Re: White Balance Question - Basic Goal?



    May I also add that you sometimes can "blow" one of the colorchannels if you are shooting with a mixture of different lighsources, especially the red channel can be blown/clipped when shooting indoors with low colortemperatures. The WB presets could not prevent one of the channels to get blown/clipped. I needed to set a manual whitebalance to fix the problem. A reference card is a great solution.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •