Shooting The Moon Failures

[Jon Ruyle]

Did you try a lower shutter speed (with lower iso and/or stopped down a bit)? Seems like on a tripod, 1/100 or so should be no problem.


Proof is in the pudding though.

[Stu]

One problem with shooting with a long lens is that your movement, ANDD that of the moon in motion mean that you need a fast enough shutter speed. I use various techniques but always shoot in Manual mode and change shutter speeds to get the best exposure. f/8 or lower, ISO 400 are my usual start points.

[Mark Elberson]

Here's my 1st attempt at a moon shot. It was much more difficult than I imagined to achieve critical focus! This crop makes up about 10% of the entire frame. Comments appreciated :-)


Here's the goods:


Focus was done manually using 10X Live View


Canon EOS 50D, Manual Exposure, 1/1600, f/8, ISO 400, Tripod Mounted EF100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM


[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.26.13/2009_2D00_12_2D00_01_2D00_20_2D00_53_2D00_00.JPG[/img]

[Jon Ruyle]

Very nice, Mark.


If you think getting focus right was tough with live view, imagine how tough it was before live view (not to mention shooting dim non-moon night sky objects).

[Eric Smith]

The original question mentioned shooting the full moon. As you can see in photos posted in this thread, partial moon photos tend to be more interesting. The most visually striking part is along the terminator, the edge between the moon's night and day. This is where craters have dramatic light and shadow. Full moon photos tend to look flat and featureless.