Quote Originally Posted by neuroanatomist





The general rule is as stated above; the center AF point is accurate to 1/3 of the DOF when used with an f/2.8 or faster lens; the other AF points, like the center point with a lens slower than f/2.8, are accurate to within the DOF. Note that it does not matter what the aperture is set to for the picture - the aperture is wide open for focusing, then stops down just at you take the shot (which is why there's a DOF preview button!).


RE:"I do have 4 lenses at 2.8 or better, I just can't afford to have a longer lens faster than 4.0." - If you mean zoom lenses, yes - fast zooms are $$. Have you considered a prime? The 85mm f/1.8 is a great lens for portraits on a 1.6 crop body (136mm equivalent for 35mm, which is a 'classic' focal length for tight head shots, and works for full body shots with nice compression if you have a large space to work in). On a crop body like the XTi, a 50mm lens equates to 85mm full frame (a 'classic' portrait length for body shots) - Canon's 'nifty-fifty' (the 50mm f/1.8) is ~US$100, and is a great value and quite sharp lens (focus is accurate but loud and slowish, and bokeh is poor, but neither of those should matter much in a studio setting).
<div style="CLEAR: both"]</div>

Ok, tell me if this is right: if I continue to use my 70-200 f4 at 10 feet, which has a total DOF of 0.93' (focused wide open), then the focus will be correct within 0.46' +/-, even if I shoot at f8. However, if I used a 70-200 f2.8, which has a total DOF of 0.65' (focused wide open), then the focus will be correct within 0.22' +/- (total front and back) or is it 0.11' +/- (to the front and another 0.11' +/- to the back).


I looked up circle of confusion for my XTi and its 0.019mm. If I wanted to blow up the picture to beyond thelimits of COC, then will I need a bigger COC? If yes, is that why a full frame sensor is better for blow-ups and not the number of pixels?


I have a few primes...the 50mm 1.8, 100mm 2.8 macro (non-L), and a 135mm 2.8 sf. My other 2.8 lens is the Sigma 18-50 2.8, which takes sharper pictures between 18-24 than at 50mm. I think the space is 15x45, so I have space to move back if needed.


Thanks again.